PROBLEMeee258.com

eee258.com  时间:2021-04-09  阅读:()
ARRAYCALIBRATIONWITHMODIFIEDITERATIVEHOS-SOS(MIHOSS)ALGORITHMMetinAktas,andT.
EnginTuncerElectricalandElectronicsEngineeringDepartment,MiddleEastTechnicalUniversity,Ankara,TURKEYmaktas@eee.
metu.
edu.
tr,etuncer@metu.
edu.
trhttp://www.
eee.
metu.
edu.
tr/sam/index.
htmlABSTRACTJointdirection-of-arrival(DOA)andsensorpositionestima-tionforrandomlydeployedsensorsisintroducedinItera-tiveHOS-SOS(IHOSS)algorithm[1].
IHOSSalgorithmex-ploitstheadvantagesofbothhigher-order-statistics(HOS)andsecond-order-statistics(SOS)withaniterativealgorithmusingtworeferencesensors.
Theiterativealgorithmisguar-anteedtoconverge.
IHOSSalgorithmsolvesthepositionam-biguitybyusingsourcesignalsobservedatmultiplefrequen-ciesandhenceitisapplicableforwidebandsignals.
Inthispaper,weproposeModied-IHOSS(MIHOSS)algorithmtosolvethesameproblemfornarrowbandsignals.
InMIHOSS,itisassumedthatthenominalsensorpositionsareknown.
Itisshownthatambiguityproblemissolvedeffectivelywith-outanyassumptiononthepositionperturbations.
Theup-perboundofperturbationsforunambiguoussensorpositionestimationispresented.
TheperformanceofMIHOSSap-proachestotheCramer-Raobound(CRB)forbothDOAandpositionestimation.
1.
INTRODUCTIONThedeviationofarrayparametersfromtheassumedmodelgenerateserrorsforthearrayprocessingapplicationsinclud-ingDOAestimationandbeamforming.
Gain/phasemis-matchofantennas,mutualcouplingandantennapositioner-rorsaresomeexamplesofarraymodelingerrors.
Arraycal-ibrationisthetaskofestimatingtheerrorsinarraymodelaswellastheDOAandsourceparameters.
Inthispaper,wefo-cusonarraycalibrationforthesensorpositionerrors.
Sensorpositionerrorsareimportantinpracticalapplicationswherethesensorsaredistributedinawideareaortherearesensordisplacementsduetotheplatformasinthecaseofsensorsonthewingtipsofaplane.
Inthispaper,jointDOAandsensorpositionestimationisdoneinasettingwherethenominalsensorpositionsareknown.
Inthiscase,itisassumedthattherearetworefer-encesensorswhosepositionsareknownperfectly.
Therestofthesensorsaredistributedrandomlyinalargearea.
Whilethenominalpositionsofthedistributedsensorsareknown,thereisnoassumptionontheperturbationforthesensorpo-sitions.
Notethattheproblemdenedaboveisdifferentthanthepartiallycalibratedarrays(PCA)[3]sincethenumberofsourcesisnotrestrictedtobelessthanthenumberofrefer-encesensors.
Furthermore,thesensorpositionsareestimatedinourcaseasopposedto[3].
Intheliterature,arraycalibrationproblemforthesensorpositionerrorsisinvestigatedintwosettings,namelysmallerror[4]andlargeerrorapproximations[5].
Insmallerrorapproximation,theperturbationsareassumedtobesmallandarraycalibrationisperformedbyusingarstorderapprox-imation.
Therstorderapproximationisnotapplicableastheperturbationsareincreased.
Largeerrorapproximation[5]isproposedtocircumventthelimitationsofthesmaller-rorapproximation.
HowevertheDOAestimationproblemisconsideredforauniformcirculararrayandforsomexedsourceDOAs.
Oneofthemainproblemsinsensorpositionestimationfromtheknowledgeofsourceobserveddataistheambiguityinsensorpositions.
Ambiguityarisesduetothewraparoundinarraysteeringmatrixphaseterms.
PreviouslyIHOSSalgorithm[1],[6]ispresented,whichjointlyusesHOSandSOSapproachesiterativelyforthees-timationofbothsourceDOAsandsensorpositions.
Theit-erativeprocessisguaranteedtoconverge.
InIHOSSalgo-rithm,exceptthetworeferencesensorsthereisnoaprioriinformationaboutthesensorpositions.
Thepositionsofthetworeferencesensorsareassumedtobeknown.
IHOSSal-gorithmconsiderstheambiguityprobleminsensorpositionestimationandsolvestheproblembyusingthesourcesig-nalsobservedatmultiplefrequencies.
Henceitisapplica-bleforwidebandsignals.
Inthispaper,IHOSSalgorithmismodiedforthenarrowbandsignalsandthenewalgorithmiscalledasMIHOSS.
Sinceforthenarrowbandcase,sourcesignalscanonlybeobservedatsinglefrequency,MIHOSSrequirestoknowthenominalsensorpositionstosolvetheambiguityproblem.
Itisprovedthattheambiguityproblemcanbesolvediftheperturbationsarebounded.
Theupperboundfortheperturbationsisalsopresented.
BothIHOSSandMIHOSSalgorithmscaneffectivelybeusedinthearraycalibrationproblemforthesensorpositionerrorsfordifferentapplications.
SincedifferentassumptionsareusedforIHOSSandMIHOSSalgorithms,thecompari-sonbetweenthemisnotfair.
2.
PROBLEMSTATEMENTItisassumedthatthearrayiscomposedofrandomlyde-ployedMsensorsandthereareLfar-eldsources.
Twosen-sorsareselectedasthereferencesensors.
Thesensorpo-sitionsarerandomlyperturbedfromtheirnominalpositionsexceptthereferencesensors.
Thepositionsofthereferencesensorsareassumedtobeknownandthedistancebetweenthemislessthanorequaltoλ/2,whereλisthewavelengthoftheincomingsourcesignals.
Undertheseassumptions,thereceivedsignalvectorforthesensorarraycanbewrittenas,x(t)=A(Θ,P0+P)s(t)+v(t),t=1,2,.
.
.
,N(1)where,Nisthenumberofsnapshots,s(t)=[s1(t),.
.
.
,sL(t)]TistheL*1vectorofLsources,v(t)istheM*1vec-torofGaussiannoise.
Sourcesignalsareassumedtobe19thEuropeanSignalProcessingConference(EUSIPCO2011)Barcelona,Spain,August29-September2,2011EURASIP,2011-ISSN2076-1465614non-Gaussianandtheycanbecorrelatedbutnotcoherent.
Noiseisassumedtobestatisticallyindependentwiththesourcesignals.
Θ=[θ1,.
.
.
,θL]isthesourceDOAvector,P0=[p01T,.
.
.
,p0MT]TandP=[pT1,.
.
.
,pTM]Tarethenominalsensorpositionsandtheperturbationsinpositions,respec-tively.
A(Θ,P)istheM*Larraysteeringmatrix,composedof,A(Θ,P0+P)mi=expj2πλp0m,x+pm,xcosθi+p0m,y+pm,ysinθi(2)where,θiisthedirection-of-arrivalofithsourceinazimuth,p0m=[p0m,x,p0m,y]andpm=[pm,x,pm,y]arethe2Dnominalpositionofthemthsensorandthe2Dperturbationofthemthsensorposition,respectively.
Sincethepositionsofthetworeferencesensorsareknown,theirperturbationsarezero,i.
e.
,pm=0,m=1,2.
(.
)Tisthetransposeoperator.
ThegoalinthispaperistoestimatebothDOAsofLsourcesandtheperturbationparametersofM2sensors.
3.
MIHOSSALGORITHMInthissection,MIHOSSalgorithmisintroducedforasolu-tiontotheproblemdescribedinSection2.
MIHOSSalgo-rithmisbasedontheIHOSSalgorithm[1],whichusestheHOSandSOSapproachesjointly.
Thebasicdifferencebe-tweentheIHOSSandMIHOSSistheirsolutionoftheam-biguityinsensorpositions.
IHOSSalgorithmrequiresob-servationsatmultiplefrequencies.
Ontheotherhand,MI-HOSSusesthenominalsensorpositionstosolvetheambi-guityproblemandcanbeappliedfornarrowbandsignals.
3.
1HOSBasedBlindDOAEstimationIn[7],itisshownthatHOSapproachcanbeusedtondtheDOAandarraysteeringmatrixestimatesforrandomsensorgeometrieswithoutknowingthesensorpositionsexceptthetworeferencesensors.
Inthisrespectcumulantmatrixcom-posedoffourth-ordercumulantsareusedtogetherwiththeESPRITalgorithm.
Ontheotherhand,asexplainedin[1],thisapproachcanbeemployedforDOAestimationaslongasthesourcesignalsareindependent.
IHOSSalgorithm[1]overcomesthislimitationbyproposinganewcumulantma-trixestimationtechnique,whichismorerobusttothedepen-dencybetweensourcesignals,i.
e.
,C=L∑i=1A(i)1CsA(i)1HA(i)1CsA(i)2HA(i)2CsA(i)1HA(i)1CsA(i)1H(3)whereAistheestimateofthearraysteeringmatrix,A,andA(i)j=QiAq(i)jA,j∈{1,2}.
q(i)jisthecomplexcon-jugateofthejthrowofthematrixQi=IAZiA.
(.
)istheMoore-Penrosepseudoinverseoperator.
ZiistheL*Ldiagonalmatrixwhosediagonalelementsareoneexcepttheithelement.
Theithelementissettozero.
CsistheL2*L2sourcecumulantmatrixintheformof,Cs(i,j)=Cum(sk(t),sl(t),sm(t),sn(t))(4)i=L(m1)+l,1≤m,l≤Lj=L(n1)+k,1≤n,k≤LNotethatthecumulantmatrixestimatein(3)isagener-alizedcumulantmatrixestimatewhichimprovestheparame-terestimatesdependingontheaccuracyofthearraysteeringmatrixestimation.
In[1],itisshownthatiftheactualarraysteeringmatrixisknown,i.
e.
,A=A,thecumulantmatrixestimatein(3)simpliesto,C=ARHOSsAHARHOSsDAHADHRHOSsAHARHOSsAH(5)L*LdiagonalmatricesRHOSsandDaredenedas,RHOSs=diag(γ1,γ2,.
.
.
,γL)(6)D=diagej2πλΔcos(θ1),.
.
.
,ej2πλΔcos(θL)(7)whereγi=Cum(si(t),si(t),si(t),si(t))andΔ≤λ/2isthedistancebetweenthetworeferencesensors.
Thereferencesensorsareassumedtobelocatedat(0,0)and(Δ,0)onthecoordinatesystemforsimplicity.
Notethat,thecumulantmatrixin(5)isinthesameformofthecorrelationmatrixintheESPRITalgorithm.
Theonlydifferenceisthesourcecor-relationmatrixdenedforSOSisreplacedbyRHOSs.
Sincethecumulantmatrixin(5)isnotavailableinpractice,itses-timatein(3)isusedfortheparameterestimation.
TheDOAandarraysteeringmatrixestimatesarefoundfromtheeigenvaluedecompositionofC,i.
e.
,CS=SΛsasintheESPRITalgorithm.
Λsisthediagonalmatrixcom-posedoftheLlargesteigenvaluesofthematrixCand2M*LmatrixS=[ST1ST2]Tisobtainedfromtheeigenvectorscorrespondingtotheseeigenvalues.
S1andS2areM*Lma-trices.
TheDOAandthearraysteeringmatrixestimatesarefoundbyapplyingtheESPRITalgorithm,i.
e.
,θi=cos1Φ(i,i)2πΔλ(8)A=S1Ψ(9)whereΦ(i,i)isthephasetermoftheithdiagonalelementofthematrixΦ.
L*Ldiagonalmatrix,Φ,andL*Lmatrix,Ψ,arerelatedas,S1S2Ψ=ΨΦ(10)NotethatknowingthedistanceandthedirectionbetweenthetworeferencesensorsaresufcientfortheDOAestimationasin(8).
However,itisnotthecaseforthearraysteeringmatrixestimation.
IntheESPRITalgorithmthearraysteer-ingmatrixestimationisfounduptoanunknownscalefactorasin(9).
Tondthescalefactor,inadditiontothedistanceandthedirectionbetweenthetworeferencesensors,itisre-quiredtoknowoneofthereferencesensorposition.
Sinceitisassumedthattherstreferencesensorislocatedat(0,0),therstrowofthearraysteeringmatrixhastobeconsistofallones.
Then,theactualarraysteeringmatrixcanbefoundfrom(9),i.
e.
,A=AH1(11)whereH=diag(a11,a12,.
.
.
,a1L)andaijistheithrowandjthcolumnofmatrixA.
6153.
2UnambiguousSensorLocalizationOncetheDOAandarraysteeringmatrixestimationsarefound,sensorlocationscanbeestimatedusing(2).
Dueto2πambiguity,theelementsofthearraysteeringmatrixin(2),correspondingtomthsensorandithsourcecanberewrit-teninthefollowingform,am,i=ej2πλ[(p0m+pm)u(θi)λkm,i](12)where,km,iisanintegerspeciedforthemthsensorandtheithsource.
u(θi)=[cos(θi),sin(θi)]Tistheunitdirectionvectoroftheithincomingsource.
Whenalltheincomingsourcesareconsidered,thefollowingrelationcanbewritten,p0m+pmU(Θ)=λ2πΞm+λkm,1≤m≤M(13)whereΞm=[(am,1)(am,2)am,L)](14)km=[km,1km,2.
.
.
km,L](15)U(Θ)=u(θ1).
.
.
u(θL)(16)xstandsfortheestimationofxand(am,i)isthephasetermofthearraysteeringmatrixelementestimatein(12).
Thepositionperturbationofthemthsensorcaneasilybefoundfrom(13)intheleastsquaressenseas,pm(km)=λ2πΞm+λkmU(Θ)p0m,1≤m≤M(17)Notethatthepositionperturbationestimatein(17)takesdif-ferentvaluesfordifferentkmvalues.
Therefore,pm(km)val-uesareconsideredastheambiguouspositionperturbationestimatesofthemthsensor.
Ifthepositionperturbationislimited,theambiguityproblemcanbesolvedbyselectingthesensorpositionper-turbationestimatewithminimumnorm,i.
e.
,pm=argminkmpm(km)(18)TheupperboundofperturbationsforunambiguoussensorpositionestimationsisgiveninLemma-1.
Lemma-1:Letdmbetheminimumdistancebetweenac-tualandestimatedpositionperturbationofthemthsensor,i.
e.
,pm(km)pm≤dm.
Then,theambiguityprobleminsensorpositionestimationissolvedifthefollowingcondi-tionissatisedfor,1≤m≤M,pm<λ2mink(1)m=k(2)m∈kmk(1)mk(2)mU(Θ)maxmdm(19)TheproofofLemma-1isnotgivenduetospacelimita-tions.
3.
3SOS-BasedMUSICAlgorithmSensorpositionmatrixestimate,P=P0+P,isconstructedusing(18)withthenominalsensorpositionsandusedintheMUSICalgorithmtogeneratetheMUSICpseudospec-trum,i.
e.
,Γ(θ)=aH(θ,P)GGHa(θ,P)1whereGistheM*(ML)matrixwhosecolumnsarecomposedoftheeigenvectorscorrespondingtoMLsmallesteigenvaluesofthecorrelationmatrixobtainedintheSOSapproach.
TheDOAandthearraysteeringmatrixestimatesfortheSOSapproachareobtainedbyndingtheLlargestpeaksoftheMUSICpseudospectrum,i.
e.
,θiLi=1=argmaxθΓ(θ)(20)A=a(θ1,P),a(θ2,P),.
.
.
,a(θL,P)(21)3.
4TheCostFunctionandTheAlgorithmicStepsMIHOSSalgorithmiterativelyupdatestheDOAandarraysteeringmatrixestimatesusingtheHOSandSOSapproachessequentiallyassummarizedinTable1.
Thecostfunctionusedateachiterationtoselectthebestarraysteeringvec-torestimatesforeachsourceisdenedbytheMUSICpseu-dospectrum,i.
e.
,Γ(ai)=aHiGGHai1(22)whereaiarethearraysteeringvectorestimatefortheithsource.
Notethatthecostfunction,Γ(ai)isnon-negative.
Ateachiteration,n,wehaveΓ(a(n)i)≥Γ(a(n1)i)≥0.
There-fore,theproposedMIHOSSalgorithmisguaranteedtocon-vergetoacertainvalue,Γ,attheendoftheiterations.
How-ever,theconvergencetothisvaluedoesnotmeanthattheglobaloptimumisreachedasitisthegeneraldisadvantageofalliterativealgorithms[8].
4.
PERFORMANCERESULTSMIHOSSalgorithmiscomparedwiththeMUSIC[2]andsmallerrorapproximation[4],illustratedasSmallErrorinthegures,forDOAandsensorpositionestimations.
CRB[1]isalsoevaluatedforbothDOAandsensorpositionesti-mation.
WhileMIHOSSandSmallErroralgorithmsareit-erativemethods,MUSICalgorithmisnoniterativeone.
AsstatedinTable1,MIHOSSstartswiththeSOSMUSICalgo-rithmanditeratesHOSandSOSapproachestoupdatebothDOAandsensorpositionestimations.
AlsoSmallError[4]algorithmstartswithMUSICalgorithmanditerativelyup-datesbothDOAandsensorpositionestimationsusingSOSapproach.
Therefore,comparingMUSICalgorithmwithMI-HOSSandSmallErroralgorithmsshowstheeffectivenessoftheiterationprocesses.
Notethatforafaircomparison,thesensorpositionestimationalgorithmdescribedinSection3.
2isalsoappliedfortheMUSICalgorithm.
Itisassumedthattherearetwofar-eldsourcesandM=10sensors.
Eachsensorpositionexceptthetworef-erencesensorsisrandomlyselectedfromauniformdistri-butioninthedeploymentareaof2λ*2λ.
Thereferencesensorsareplacedat(0,0)and(λ/2,0).
Thepositionsofthesensorsotherthanthereferencesensorsarearbitrarilyper-turbed.
Theperturbationvaluesarerandomlyselectedwithauniformdistribution.
Fortheparameterestimation,N=1000snapshotsarecollected.
Theperformanceresultsaretheav-erageof100trials.
Ateachtrial,sourcesignals,noise,thesensorpositionsexceptthereferencesensors,theperturba-tionsandtheDOAanglesofsourcesignalsarechangedran-domly.
ThedifferencebetweentheDOAanglesofthesource616Table1:PseudocodeforMIHOSSalgorithm.
n=0.
Findtheinitialvaluesofthearraysteering1vectorforeachsource,a(0)i,withSOSapproachasin(21)usingthenominalsensorpositions.
;Termination=true.
Estimatetheproposedcumulant2matrixfromthearrayoutputanda(n)iasin(3).
Then,ndtheDOAestimates,θHOSiusing(8)andthearraysteeringmatrixAHOS,using(11),for1≤i≤L;Findthesensorpositionestimates,P=P0+P,asin3(18)using(16)and(14)withθHOSiandAHOS,for1≤i≤L;Findθ(SOS)iusingPasin(20).
Then,nda(SOS)iusing4Pandθ(SOS)iasin(21);fori=1toLdo5ifΓ(a(SOS)i)≥Γ(a(n)i)then6a(n+1)i=a(SOS)i,θ(n+1)i=θ(SOS)i,7Γ(a(n+1)i)=Γ(a(SOS)i),Termination=false;else8a(n+1)i=a(n)i,θ(n+1)i=θ(n)i;9end10end11ifTermination=falsethen12n=n+1,GotoStep2;13else14Findthenalestimateofsensorpositionsusing15θ(n)ianda(n)i,1≤i≤L;end16signalsissetto40degrees.
Thesourcesignalshaveauni-formdistributionandthenoiseisadditivewhiteGaussiananduncorrelatedwiththesourcesignals.
TheperformanceresultsfortheDOAandsensorposi-tionestimationsatdifferentSNRvaluesareillustratedinFig.
1.
Thesensorpositionperturbationislimitedto0.
1λ.
ItisseenthatbothMUSICandsmallerrorapproachalgorithm(SmallError)haveaooringeffectforbothDOAandsen-sorpositionestimations.
AsitisseeninFig.
1,SmallErroralgorithmslightlyimprovestheMUSICperformance.
ItisalsoseenthatafterapproximatelySNR=7dBMIHOSSal-gorithmsignicantlyoutperformsandcloselyfollowsCRBforbothDOAandsensorpositionestimations.
InFig.
2,theperformanceofthealgorithmsispresentedfordifferentpositionperturbations.
SNRissetto30dB.
AsitisseeninFig.
2,theparameterestimationperformanceofMIHOSSalgorithmisnotaffectedfromthevalueofpertur-bationsandcloselyfollowsCRB.
ItisalsoobservedinFig.
2-(b)that,MIHOSSalgorithmeffectivelysolvestheambigu-ityproblemuptoaperturbationvalueof0.
42λ.
Thecondi-tionpresentedinLemma-1isnotsatisedforfurtherincreaseinperturbationsandsensorpositionscannotbefoundunam-biguously.
NotethatDOAestimationisaccurateandisnotaffectedbythesensorpositionambiguityasshowninFig.
2-(a).
Thisisduetothefactthatarraysteeringmatrixesti-mateisaccuratewhilethepositionsareambiguous.
Theper-formanceofbothMUSICandSmallErroralgorithmdegradesignicantlyforthelargeperturbationvalues.
SmallError0510152025303540102101100101SNR,dBDOARMSE,(DEGREES)MUSICMIHOSSSmallErrorCRB(a)0510152025303540104103102101100SNR,dBNORMALIZEDSENSORPOSITIONRMSE,(xλ)MUSICMIHOSSSmallErrorCRB(b)Figure1:(a)DOAand(b)positionestimationRMSEvaluesfordifferentSNRvaluesandsensorpositionperturbationof0.
1λ.
algorithmslightlyoutperformsMIHOSSalgorithmonlyforverysmallperturbations(lessthan0.
01λ).
Fortheperturba-tionslessthan0.
0016λMUSICoutperformsbothMIHOSSandSmallEroralgorithmsaswellasCRB.
ThereasonforthisfactisthatiterativeprocessesinMIHOSSandSmallEr-roralgorithmsdecreasetheestimationperformancesfortheextremelysmallperturbations.
Asshownin(17),pseudoin-verseoperatorisusedforsensorpositionestimation,whichisnotanexactsolution.
Iterativelyupdatingsensorpositionsmayresultworsepositionestimationthanthenominalsensorpositionswhentheperturbationisextremelysmall.
Thesim-ilarexplanationisalsovalidfortheSmallErroralgorithm.
WhileCRBdoesnotspecifyanyalgorithmforsensorposi-tionestimation,itusesperturbationsasunknownparametersandtriesndtheminimumvarianceforbothDOAandsen-sorpositionestimationsjointly.
Hence,CRBassumesthattherearealwayserrorsinsensorpositionsevenifthereisno.
617OntheotherhandMUSICalgorithmndstheDOAandsen-sorpositionestimationsinasinglestep.
Itdoesnotassumethatthereareerrorsinsensorpositionsanddoesnotupdatetheestimationsiteratively.
103102101100102101100101102POSITIONPERTURBATION,(xλ)DOARMSE,(DEGREES)MUSICMIHOSSSmallErrorCRB(a)103102101100104103102101100POSITIONPERTURBATION,(xλ)NORMALIZEDSENSORPOSITIONRMSE,(xλ)MUSICMIHOSSSmallErrorCRB(b)Figure2:(a)DOAand(b)positionestimationRMSEvaluesfordifferentsensorpositionperturbationsandSNR=30dB.
5.
CONCLUSIONAnewmethodforjointDOAandsensorpositionestima-tionispresentedwhenthesensorsarerandomlydeployedandarbitrarilyperturbedfromtheirnominalpositions.
Itisassumedthatthedistanceandthedirectionbetweentworef-erencesensorsareknown.
HOSandSOSapproachesareem-ployedjointlyinaniterativemanner.
Theiterativemethodisguaranteedtoconverge.
Severalsimulationsaredoneanditisshownthattheproposedmethodimprovestheperfor-manceofDOAandsensorpositionestimationsignicantlyandapproachestotheCRB.
REFERENCES[1]M.
Aktas,andT.
E.
Tuncer,"IterativeHOS-SOS(IHOSS)AlgorithmforDirection-of-ArrivalEstimationandSensorLocalization,"IEEETrans.
onSignalProc.
,vol.
58,pp.
6181–6194,Dec.
2010.
[2]R.
Schmidt,"MultipleEmitterLocationandSignalPa-rameterEstimation,"Proc.
RADCSpectrumEstimationWorkshop,1979,pp.
243-258.
[3]M.
LiandY.
Lu,"SourceBearingandSteering-VectorEstimationusingPartiallyCalibratedArrays,"IEEETrans.
onAerospaceandElectronicSystems,Vol.
45,No.
4,pp.
1361-1372,October2009[4]A.
J.
WeissandB.
Friedlander,"Arrayshapecalibrationusingeigenstructuremethods,"Twenty-ThirdAsilomarConferenceonSignals,SystemsandComputers,Vol.
2,pp.
925-929,1989[5]B.
P.
FlanaganandK.
L.
Bell,"Arrayself-calibrationwithlargesensorpositionerrors,"ElsevierScienceSig-nalProcessingpp.
22012214,2001.
[6]M.
AktasandT.
E.
Tuncer,"IterativeHOS-SOS(IHOSS)BasedSensorLocalizationandDirection-Of-ArrivalEstimation,"IEEEInternationalConferenceonAcoustics,Speech,andSignalProcessing,ICASSP-2010,March2010.
[7]M.
C.
DoganandJ.
M.
Mendel,"ApplicationsofCumu-lantstoArrayProcessing-PartI:ApertureExtensionandArrayCalibration,"IEEETrans.
onSignalProc.
,Vol.
43,No.
5,pp.
1200-1216,May1995.
[8]A.
J.
WeissandB.
Friedlander,"DOAandSteeringVec-torEstimationUsingaPartiallyCalibratedArray,"IEEETrans.
onAerospaceandElectronicSystems,Vol.
32,pp.
1047-1057,1996.
618

2021年恒创科技618活动:香港/美国服务器/云服务器/高防全场3折抢购

2021年恒创科技618活动香港美国服务器/云服务器/高防全场3折抢购,老客户续费送时长,每日限量秒杀。云服务器每款限量抢购,香港美国独服/高防每款限量5台/天,香港节点是CN2线路还不错。福利一:爆品秒杀 超低价秒杀,秒完即止;福利二:云服务器 火爆机型 3折疯抢;福利三:物理服务器 爆款直降 800元/月起;福利四:DDOS防护 超强防御仅 1750元/月。点击进入:2021年恒创科技618活...

RAKsmart(年79元),云服务器年付套餐汇总 - 香港 美国 日本云服务器

RAKsmart 商家从原本只有专注于独立服务器后看到产品线比较单薄,后来陆续有增加站群服务器、高防服务器、VPS主机,以及现在也有在新增云服务器、裸机云服务器等等。机房也有增加到拥有洛杉矶、圣何塞、日本、韩国、中国香港等多个机房。在年前也有介绍到RAKsmart商家有提供年付129元的云服务器套餐,年后我们看到居然再次刷新年付云服务器低价格。我们看到云服务器低至年79元,如果有需要便宜云服务器的...

香港E3-1230v2 16GB 30M 326元/月 数脉科技

官方网站:https://www.shuhost.com/公司名:LucidaCloud Limited尊敬的新老客户:艰难的2021年即将结束,年终辞旧迎新之际,我们准备了持续优惠、及首月优惠,为中小企业及个人客户降低IT业务成本。我们将持续努力提供给客户更好的品质与服务,在新的一年期待与您有美好的合作。# 下列价钱首月八折优惠码: 20211280OFF (每客户限用1次) * 自助购买可复制...

eee258.com为你推荐
哈利波特罗恩升级当爸哈利波特 13年前的晚上发生了什么?sonicchat深圳哪里有卖汽车模型?刘祚天DJ是什么职业?丑福晋大福晋比正福晋大么www.se333se.com米奇网www.qvod333.com 看电影的效果好不?www.15job.com南方人才市场有官方网站是什么?sodu.tw今天sodu.org为什么打不开了?www.javlibrary.com跪求一个JAVHD.com的帐号www.diediao.com这是什么电影dpscyclewow3.13术士的PVE的命中多少够了?
域名空间 in域名注册 购买域名和空间 godaddy主机 kdata 流媒体服务器 光棍节日志 浙江独立 京东商城双十一活动 中国电信测速112 最好的qq空间 香港新世界中心 360云服务 双线asp空间 日本代理ip iki wordpress中文主题 服务器硬件配置 网络速度 中国电信宽带测速 更多