网络浏览器的评测与比较Evaluation and comparison of webbrowsers
In this paper, by the fire with water
DOC documents may experience poor browsing on the WAP side. Itis recommended that you first select TXT, or download the sourcefile to the local view.
Evaluation results__two topic__web browser and comparisonof course namecomputer network
First, the functional features and performance differences ofthe main network browser (hereinafter referred to as thebrowser) . The functional characteristics and performancedifferences of 5 mainstream web browsers (hereinafter referredto as browsers) are analyzed. Learn how to use differentbrowsers on different occasions and maximize the browser' seffectiveness. Learn how to use different browsers on differentoccasions and maximize the browser' s effectiveness. Master themethod of software evaluation. Master the method of softwareevaluation. Two. The software configuration is as follows:micro computer 1, configured as follows: CPU:P4 or above thelevel of memory: 512MB hard disk free capacity: 512MB withWindowsXP, IE7.0 Safari v3.2. 2 Firefox can access the Internetv3.0.6 Opera v9.63 Chrome v2.0. 162.0 three. The experimentalcontent mounted below the 5 Web browser IE, Safari, Firefox,Opera, Chrome, , , and according to the following steps on thebrowser to test function resource analysis test compatibility
test
One
Evaluation results__two topic__web browser and comparisonof course namecomputer network
Performance testing, advertising interception, testing four.Results and analysis of experiments. Experimental results andanalysis. 1, functional analysis, each browser has a plug-insupport, interface theme, a pop-up window, click the add linkintercept, Download Manager, the next time you open automaticmemory label, the label group as a bookmark, security andprivacy protection function etc. .
The feature plug-in supports IE Safari Firefox Opera ChromeSupport for supporting interface topics
The built-in multi search engine to block pop-up windowsantispyware click add link information aggregation (RSS)) RSSdownload manager the next time you open automatic memory tagswill tag group as a bookmark label thumbnail display Mac/Linuxversion BT client download spell check text box suspendedsecurity and privacy protection
There is support, there is, there is, yes, yes, yes, yes, thereis
There is support, there is, there is, yes, yes, yes, yes, thereis
There is support, there is, there is, yes, yes, there is no,there is, there is
There are, there are, there are, whether or not, no, there are,there are
There is nothing, there is, yes, yes, yes, there is
2, resource occupancy test,
Two
Evaluation results__two topic__web browser and comparisonof course namecomputer network
Open the browser to observe memory usage and CPU utilizationwhen idle, opening a single page, opening 5 pages and opening10 pages. Here are the memory footprint and CPU utilization ofeach browser when you open a single page, and you can see thatFirefox has the largest memory footprint.
Other times, each browser' s memory footprint and CPUutilization, not here a screenshot. 3, compatibility test, thetest includes three items: Acid2, Acid3 and CSS test, the totalresults are as follows: the test includes three contents:general, testing, the results are as follows: Acid2 (by not
(pass / fail) by IE Safari Firefox) by CSS (via the Acid3(through ( (fract ion) fraction) number number) 12/100 75/10071/100 55452)
Three
Evaluation results__two topic__web browser and comparisonof course namecomputer network
Opera Chrome
By way of
85/100 100/100
5962
A and Acid2 tests. Test. Acid2 is a comprehensive test of webbrowser and design software support for HTML, CSS 2 and PNGimage standards. Acid2 test site:http://acid2.acidtests.org/#top test method: open the testpage, observe the graphics display is correct
Four
Evaluation results__two topic__web browser and comparisonof course namecomputer network
Five
Evaluation results__two topic__web browser and comparisonof course namecomputer network
The focus of B, Acid3 testing, and Acid3 testing is to examinethe Web 2 specification and find incompatible vulnerabilitiesin ECMAScript and W3C Document Object Model 2 standardsapplications. The test screen is a color animation. This testrequires the browser to be configured under default,
Make sure the animation is rendered correctly, witha full scoreof 100. Acid3 test site: http://acid3.acidtests.org testmethod: open the test page, observe the graphics display iscorrect, record the test results.
Six
Evaluation results__two topic__web browser and comparisonof course namecomputer network
Seven
Evaluation results__two topic__web browser and comparisonof course name
computer network
C CSS, the test compatibility test can be 578 CSS compatibilitytest CSS test site:http://www.css3. info/selectors-test/test.html test method:log test site, wait a few minutes, the site will be given thetest results, record test pass
E i gh t
Evaluation results__two topic__web browser and comparisonof course namecomputer network
The number of items. 4, performance testing, performancetesting () performance testing (1) test items IE
3d:1314.2ms
Safari
+ + / - 3d717. 1ms
Firefox
3d:559. 2ms + / -
Opera
3d:1314.2ms + / -
Chrome
3.7%3d:171.7ms 6.4%+/cube:279. 7ms+/11. 2%11.2%cube:218.0ms+/cube:532.8ms cube:532.8ms cube:42.9ms +/14.6% 3D + / - 2.2%+ / - cube, morph (morph:64.0ms, morph: 186.5ms,
+/morph:232.8ms 12. 2% + / - 12.2% + / - 4. 7% raytrace: 2. 1%raytrace) morph: 306.2ms) morph:306.2ms 64.8ms +/ -raytrace:+ / - 18.8% + / - 9.3% + / - 6% raytrace: 9.3% 204.6ms154. 7ms raytrace:475.2ms +/14.7%raytrace:475.2ms + / - 14. 7%+ / - 6.6%
Access: access: 815.3ms + / - 4.3%
+ 15.5%
Access: 1730.8ms
769.6ms +/1.9%
Access:
Binary-trees: access 61. 1ms 815.3ms binary-trees:570.2mbinary-trees: +/-2.5%+/-4.3%+ /- 5. 7%99.7ms fannkuch:binary-trees: (binary-trees fannkuch: 358.4ms +/99. 7ms, S +/- 40. 1% + / - 5. 7% + / - 4.3% fannkuch:570.2ms 348.4ms 2. 1%annkuch, nbody, 6.7%, +/f annkuch: nbody: , nbody: nbody:339.0ms 199.6ms +/348.4ms + / - 272.0ms + / - 5.6%+ / - 4. 3%nsieve) 7.3% nbody: nsieve: nsieve:251.4ms) nsieve: 2.6% + /- 3.9% + / - 95. 2ms 272.0ms +/10. 1% 5.3% + / - 5.6% 150.5ms
Access:98.0ms + / binary-trees: + / - 15.9% fannkuch30.6ms +nbody: 39. 3ms + / nsieve: + 21.4ms
Bitops
Bitops:
Bitops:
Bitops:
Bitops: + / - 1173.0ms
Bitops:
585. 5ms 682.8ms +/1.9% 3bit-bits-in-byt 93.6ms + / - 5%+ / -3bit-bits-in-b e, bits-in-byte 3bit-bits-in-byte: , e: yte:122. 3ms 176.5ms 8% + / - 11. 7% + / - 4. 7% bitwise-and,bits-in-byte: bits-in-byte:
(3bit-bits-in-byt + / - 8.2% 1173.0ms
83. 1ms 3bit-bits-in 8.2% + / - 10.2% + / - 20.3% 5. 2msbits-in-byte 11.2ms 3bit-bits-in-byte: bitwise-and: 176.5ms+/25.2ms + / - 15.9% + / - 7.2%
Nine
Evaluation results__two topic__web browser and comparisonof course name
computer network
Nsieve-bits)
201. 5ms bitwise-and: 465. 5ms nsieve-bits: +/-6.6%+/- 7. 7%+ / - 9.3% 329.5ms
135.8ms bits-in-byte: bitwise-and: 183. 3ms +/188.9ms 5. 5%+/- 5. 2% + / - 3.6% nsieve-bits: 167.2ms bitwise-and: 158.2ms+/2.4% nsieve-bits: 219.0ms + / - 6. 5% +/2.4%
11.7%bits-in-byte: 201.5ms bitwise-and: 465.5ms nsieve-bits:+ / - 6.6% + / - 7. 7% + / - 9.3% 329.5ms
Nsieve-bits: 41. 5ms + / - 19.5%
Controlflow: controlflow: 110.9ms +/3.2% 110.9ms 63.8ms187.6ms +/- 3.2%+/- 3.9%+ /- 11.6%recursive: recursive:recursive: 110.9ms 63.8ms + / - 3.2% + / - 3.
9%递归 110.9ms + / 187.6ms + / - 11.6% 3. 2%控制流
控制流控制流 3.5ms + / - 19.8%递归 3.5ms + / - 19.8%控制流递归
密码
密码 576. 3ms + / - 9. 5%
今天遇到一个网友,他之前一直在用阿里云虚拟主机,我们知道虚拟主机绑定域名是直接在面板上绑定的。这里由于他的网站项目流量比较大,虚拟主机是不够的,而且我看他虚拟主机已经有升级过。这里要说的是,用过阿里云虚拟主机的朋友可能会比较一下价格,实际上虚拟主机价格比云服务器还贵。所以,基于成本和性能的考虑,建议他选择云服务器。毕竟他的备案都接入在阿里云。这里在选择阿里云服务器后,他就蒙圈不知道如何绑定域名。这...
virmach送来了夏季促销,价格低到爆炸,而且在低价的基础上还搞首年8折,也就是说VPS低至7.2美元/年。不过,这里有一点要说明:你所购买的当前的VPS将会在09/30/2021 ~ 04/30/2022进行服务器转移,而且IP还会改变,当前的Intel平台会换成AMD平台,机房也会变动(目前来看以后会从colocrossing切换到INAP和Psychz),采取的是就近原则,原来的水牛城可能...
如何低价香港服务器购买?想要做一个个人博客,想用香港服务器,避免繁琐备案,性能不需要多高,只是记录一些日常而已,也没啥视频之类的东西,想问问各位大佬有没有低价的香港服务器推荐?香港距大陆近,相比美国服务器最大的优势在于延迟低,ping值低,但是带宽紧张,普遍都是1M,一般戏称其为“毛细血管”。同时价格普遍高,优质稳定的一般价格不菲。大厂云梯队阿里云、腾讯云两家都有香港服务器,要注意的是尽量不要选择...