correctedvcpd
vcpd 时间:2021-01-29 阅读:()
Reviewers'comments:Reviewer#1(RemarkstotheAuthor):Inthiswell-writtenpaper,theauthorsreportonobservationofananisotropicelectricresponseintheMoS2/graphenevanderWaals(vdW)heterostructuresinresponsetothedirectionoftheexternalelectricfield.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinappropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
Yourssincerely,Dr.
KristianBerland.
1ResponsetoReviewersNCOMMS-17-33374AWethankthereviewersfortheirdetailedattentiontoourworkandtheirsupportiveandinsightfulcomments.
Wehaveconsideredeachofthecommentscarefully,andprovidepoint-by-pointresponsestothembelowinbluetext.
Relevantchangestothemanuscriptarealsowritteningreentext.
Reviewer:#1Inthiswell-writtenpaper,theauthorsreportonobservationofananisotropicelectricresponseintheMoS2/graphenevanderWaals(vdW)heterostructuresinresponsetothedirectionoftheexternalelectricfield.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer:#2TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
ResponseWethankthereviewerforhis/hercomments.
Firstandforemost,itshouldbeemphasizedthatthequantificationofanyEFMresultsisverycomplicatedandchallenging.
Thisismainlyduetotheunknowncapacitancetermdeterminedbythetipandsamplegeometryandthelong-rangenatureofelectrostaticforce.
Theprecisecalculationoftip-samplecapacitanceisonlyachievablebynumericalmethods,andseveralcalibratedparametersadhoc(seeGomilaetal.
Nanotechnology25,255702(2014)).
Suchanalysisisbeyondthescopeofthisproject.
However,wetriedtoestablishaqualitativeagreementbetweenthesimulationandEFMexperimentusingveryroughapproximations,asrequestedbythereviewer.
2WehaveincludedanewsetofdiscussionsanddataintheSupportingInformation(1.
QualitativeanalysisontheEFMresults)whereweusereasonableparameterstostrengthenthelinkbetweentheoryandexperiments.
Wecouldestimatethebehavioroftheelectricsusceptibilityasafunctionofthebiasforoneofoursystems,3LMoS2/4LGraphene.
ItcanbeseeninFigureS2thatthereisasystematicincrementoftheelectricsusceptibilityasthebiaspointstowardsMoS2,whichfollowsthebehaviorobservedinthesimulations.
Weaddedthefollowingsentencestothemanuscript:Page7,line152:"WetriedtoqualitativelyanalyzetheEFMresultstoestimatethechangeofelectricsusceptibility()ofthe3LMoS2/4LGrapheneheterostructure(seeSupportingInformation).
ThebehaviordisplaysanincrementofwiththebiaspointingtotheMoS2surface.
"Page9,line178:"…(Fig.
2(f)andFig.
S2intheSupportingInformation)…"2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinppropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
ResponseWehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentvanderWaals(vdW)densityfunctional(DF)onthemagnitudeoftheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2layers(dG-MoS2).
WehaveusedfourdifferentDF's,includingtheonesuggestedbythereviewer,e.
g.
BH.
WefoundminormodificationsbetweenthevdW-DFusedinourmanuscript(DRSLL)andotherswithdifferentchangesontheexchangepart.
ThemagnitudesofdG-MoS2differbyaround2%,whichalsocomparewellwithrecentvaluesreportedintheliterature1,2,3.
WealsocalculatedthechargedensityusingthesenewvdWfunctionalsandnegligiblevariationswereobserved.
ThisfullyjustifiesourchoiceofDRSLLinoursimulations.
WehaveincludedtheseresultsintheSupportingInformation(2.
InterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2sheets),inTableS1,FigureS4,togetherwithdiscussions,comparisonwithliteratureandnewreferences.
Wehaveincludedinpage28,line502,thefollowingsentencesreferringtothisanalysis:"WehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentmodificationsontheexchangepartofthevdWdensityfunctionalontheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2asshowninTableS1intheSupportingInformation.
Minor3differenceswerefoundbetweenDRSLLandothervdWfunctionals,astheinterlayerdistancechangesbyaround2%.
Thisresultedinnegligiblevariationsonthechargedensity(FigureS4).
"Wehavealsocorrectedthetexttoshowthatweusedatotalenergyfunctionalassuggestedbythereviewer.
Inpage4,line70:"…weemployedquantummechanicalabinitiosimulationsbasedondensityfunctionaltheory(DFT)usingatotalenergyvdWfunctionaltoresolve…"Page8,line155:"…canbeexplainedattwotheoreticallevels,bothbyabinitiosimulationswithvdW-functionals,…"1.
Y.
Ma,Y.
Dai,M.
Guo,C.
NiuandB.
Huang.
GrapheneadhesiononMoS2monolayer:Anabinitiostudy.
Nanoscale3,3883(2011).
2.
W.
Hu,T.
Wang,R.
ZhangandJ.
Yang.
EffectsofinterlayercouplingandelectricfieldsontheelectronicstructuresofgrapheneandMoS2heterobilayers.
J.
Mat.
Chem.
C4,1776(2016).
3.
X.
LiuandZ.
Li.
ElectricFieldandStrainEffectonGraphene-MoS2HybridStructure:AbInitioCalculations.
J.
Phys.
Chem.
Lett.
6,3269(2015).
3)Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
ResponseWehavereviewedthemanuscriptthoroughlyusingtheword"asymmetric"insteadof"anisotropic"throughoutthetext.
Wehavealsodefinedunclearabbreviationsinthetext.
Page4,line87:"achievedbytworoundsofpolymethyl-methacrylate(PMMA)transfer…"4Page5,line99:"Thecorrespondingatomicforcemicroscopy(AFM)imageoftheheterostructureonAuisdisplayed…"Page6,line117:"VCPDisthecontactpotentialdifference(CPD)duetothemismatch…"Wehavemodifiedthroughoutthetexttheabbreviationof"graphene"by"G",andnowuse"graphene"insteadfordescribingthestructures.
REVIEWERS'COMMENTS:Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):Theauthorshaveaddressedbothconcernsinasatisfactorymanner.
Irecommenditforpublication.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinappropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
Yourssincerely,Dr.
KristianBerland.
1ResponsetoReviewersNCOMMS-17-33374AWethankthereviewersfortheirdetailedattentiontoourworkandtheirsupportiveandinsightfulcomments.
Wehaveconsideredeachofthecommentscarefully,andprovidepoint-by-pointresponsestothembelowinbluetext.
Relevantchangestothemanuscriptarealsowritteningreentext.
Reviewer:#1Inthiswell-writtenpaper,theauthorsreportonobservationofananisotropicelectricresponseintheMoS2/graphenevanderWaals(vdW)heterostructuresinresponsetothedirectionoftheexternalelectricfield.
Theexperimentsseemcarefullyexecutedandareaccompaniedwiththeoreticalsimulationsandmodels.
Thefinding,astheauthorsstated,revealfundamentalknowledgeofthescreeningpropertiesofvdWheterostructuresandcouldleadtonoveldeviceapplicationssuchasoptoelectronicandplasmonicdevices.
Thepresentationismoreoverofaveryhighquality.
IseenoobjectiontothepublicationoftheworkinitspresentforminNatureCommunications.
However,IdocautiontheEditorthat,asanexperimentalist,Imighthavemisseddefectsinthetheoreticalsimulation/modelling.
Reviewer:#2TheauthorspresentaninterestingstudyoftheelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures,combiningadvancedexperimentalprobeswithfirst-principletheoryandaneasy-to-graspclassical-electrostaticapproach.
ThepaperpresentsaconvincingdemonstrationofdesignableasymmetricelectricalfieldscreeningofvanderWaalsheterostructures.
ThiscouldbeofmuchutilityinnovelelectronicdevicesbasedonvanderWaalsheterostructures.
IbelievethepapercouldtriggerseveralstudiesofelectricalfieldscreeningofvdWheterostructuresandIamthereforeinclinedtorecommendthepaperforpublications.
However,Ihavetwoconcerns:1)Whilebothindicatingasymmetricelectricalfieldscreening,thelinkbetweentheoryandexperimentisquiteweak.
Thepaperwouldbemoreconvincingiftheauthorsmadeasimplequantitativemodel(dampedoscillatormodel)showinghowthecomputedasymmetricresponsegivesrisetothevariationintheEFMphase.
Aqualitativeagreementwithsomereasonablychosenparameterswouldbesufficienttomakeacompellingcase.
ResponseWethankthereviewerforhis/hercomments.
Firstandforemost,itshouldbeemphasizedthatthequantificationofanyEFMresultsisverycomplicatedandchallenging.
Thisismainlyduetotheunknowncapacitancetermdeterminedbythetipandsamplegeometryandthelong-rangenatureofelectrostaticforce.
Theprecisecalculationoftip-samplecapacitanceisonlyachievablebynumericalmethods,andseveralcalibratedparametersadhoc(seeGomilaetal.
Nanotechnology25,255702(2014)).
Suchanalysisisbeyondthescopeofthisproject.
However,wetriedtoestablishaqualitativeagreementbetweenthesimulationandEFMexperimentusingveryroughapproximations,asrequestedbythereviewer.
2WehaveincludedanewsetofdiscussionsanddataintheSupportingInformation(1.
QualitativeanalysisontheEFMresults)whereweusereasonableparameterstostrengthenthelinkbetweentheoryandexperiments.
Wecouldestimatethebehavioroftheelectricsusceptibilityasafunctionofthebiasforoneofoursystems,3LMoS2/4LGraphene.
ItcanbeseeninFigureS2thatthereisasystematicincrementoftheelectricsusceptibilityasthebiaspointstowardsMoS2,whichfollowsthebehaviorobservedinthesimulations.
Weaddedthefollowingsentencestothemanuscript:Page7,line152:"WetriedtoqualitativelyanalyzetheEFMresultstoestimatethechangeofelectricsusceptibility()ofthe3LMoS2/4LGrapheneheterostructure(seeSupportingInformation).
ThebehaviordisplaysanincrementofwiththebiaspointingtotheMoS2surface.
"Page9,line178:"…(Fig.
2(f)andFig.
S2intheSupportingInformation)…"2)Thechoiceofxc-functionalisunclearandmaybeinppropriate.
DRSLLisrarelyusedtodenotethevanderWaalsdensityfunctionalofDionet.
al.
vdW-DFwouldbemorestandard.
NotealsothatvdW-DFisatotalxc-energyfunctional,itisnotvdW-"corrected"GGA.
Beyondnomenclature,thestandardpartnerforthenon-localcorrelationofvdW-DFisarevPBEexchangefunctional;however,thischoicesignificantlyoverestimateinter-layerseparations.
ThetextmightbeinterpretedasiftheauthorsusedthePBEexchangefunctionalincombinationwithvdW-DFnon-localcorrelation.
However,thisisnotarecommendedchoiceandshouldbeavoidedinstudieslikethisone.
ItwouldbemoreappropriatetouseforinstancevdW-DF-cxorrev-vdW-DF2.
FormoredetailsonvdW-DF,consultROPP78,066501,2015.
Thechoiceoffunctionaliscrucialforthespecificquantitativepredictionsasinter-layerseparationscouldhavegreatbearingonthescreeningproperties.
ResponseWehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentvanderWaals(vdW)densityfunctional(DF)onthemagnitudeoftheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2layers(dG-MoS2).
WehaveusedfourdifferentDF's,includingtheonesuggestedbythereviewer,e.
g.
BH.
WefoundminormodificationsbetweenthevdW-DFusedinourmanuscript(DRSLL)andotherswithdifferentchangesontheexchangepart.
ThemagnitudesofdG-MoS2differbyaround2%,whichalsocomparewellwithrecentvaluesreportedintheliterature1,2,3.
WealsocalculatedthechargedensityusingthesenewvdWfunctionalsandnegligiblevariationswereobserved.
ThisfullyjustifiesourchoiceofDRSLLinoursimulations.
WehaveincludedtheseresultsintheSupportingInformation(2.
InterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2sheets),inTableS1,FigureS4,togetherwithdiscussions,comparisonwithliteratureandnewreferences.
Wehaveincludedinpage28,line502,thefollowingsentencesreferringtothisanalysis:"WehaveexplicitlycheckedtheeffectofdifferentmodificationsontheexchangepartofthevdWdensityfunctionalontheinterlayerdistancebetweengrapheneandMoS2asshowninTableS1intheSupportingInformation.
Minor3differenceswerefoundbetweenDRSLLandothervdWfunctionals,astheinterlayerdistancechangesbyaround2%.
Thisresultedinnegligiblevariationsonthechargedensity(FigureS4).
"Wehavealsocorrectedthetexttoshowthatweusedatotalenergyfunctionalassuggestedbythereviewer.
Inpage4,line70:"…weemployedquantummechanicalabinitiosimulationsbasedondensityfunctionaltheory(DFT)usingatotalenergyvdWfunctionaltoresolve…"Page8,line155:"…canbeexplainedattwotheoreticallevels,bothbyabinitiosimulationswithvdW-functionals,…"1.
Y.
Ma,Y.
Dai,M.
Guo,C.
NiuandB.
Huang.
GrapheneadhesiononMoS2monolayer:Anabinitiostudy.
Nanoscale3,3883(2011).
2.
W.
Hu,T.
Wang,R.
ZhangandJ.
Yang.
EffectsofinterlayercouplingandelectricfieldsontheelectronicstructuresofgrapheneandMoS2heterobilayers.
J.
Mat.
Chem.
C4,1776(2016).
3.
X.
LiuandZ.
Li.
ElectricFieldandStrainEffectonGraphene-MoS2HybridStructure:AbInitioCalculations.
J.
Phys.
Chem.
Lett.
6,3269(2015).
3)Minorcomments:Whynotusethewordasymmetricthroughout,andnotuseanisotropic.
Thereadermightbelieveitreferstoanisotropicsusceptibility,(i.
e.
dipoleforminginthexyplane),butthatisnotthetopicofthispaper.
Someabbreviationsareundefinied,inparticularintheexperimentalsection.
MaybealsoavoidusingGasabbreivationsbothinRamanspectroscopyandfordescribingthestructure.
ResponseWehavereviewedthemanuscriptthoroughlyusingtheword"asymmetric"insteadof"anisotropic"throughoutthetext.
Wehavealsodefinedunclearabbreviationsinthetext.
Page4,line87:"achievedbytworoundsofpolymethyl-methacrylate(PMMA)transfer…"4Page5,line99:"Thecorrespondingatomicforcemicroscopy(AFM)imageoftheheterostructureonAuisdisplayed…"Page6,line117:"VCPDisthecontactpotentialdifference(CPD)duetothemismatch…"Wehavemodifiedthroughoutthetexttheabbreviationof"graphene"by"G",andnowuse"graphene"insteadfordescribingthestructures.
REVIEWERS'COMMENTS:Reviewer#2(RemarkstotheAuthor):Theauthorshaveaddressedbothconcernsinasatisfactorymanner.
Irecommenditforpublication.
ZJI-全场八折优惠，香港服务器 600元起，还有日本/美国/韩国服务器
月付/年付优惠码：zji 下物理服务器/VDS/虚拟主机空间订单八折终身优惠（长期有效）一、ZJI官网点击直达ZJI官方网站二、特惠香港日本服务器香港大埔：http://hkdb.speedtest.zji.net/香港葵湾：http://hkkw.speedtest.zji.net/日本大阪：http://jpsk.speedtest.zji.net/日本大阪一型 ...
sharktech：老牌高防服务器商，跳楼价，1G独享$70、10G共享$240、10G独享$800
不知道大家是否注意到sharktech的所有服务器的带宽价格全部跳楼跳水，降幅简直不忍直视了，还没有见过这么便宜的独立服务器。根据不同的机房，价格也是不一样的。大带宽、不限流量比较适合建站、数据备份、做下载、做流媒体、做CDN等多种业务。 官方网站：https://www.sharktech.net 付款方式：比特币、信用卡、PayPal、支付宝、西联汇款 以最贵的洛杉矶机器为例，配置表如...
ReliableSite：美国服务器租用,洛杉矶/纽约/迈阿密等机房;E3-1240V6/64GB/1TSSD,$95/月
reliablesite怎么样?reliablesite是一家于2006年成立的老牌美国主机商，主要提供独服，数据中心有迈阿密、纽约、洛杉矶等，均免费提供20Gbps DDoS防护，150TB月流量，1Gbps带宽。月付19美金可升级为10Gbps带宽。洛杉矶/纽约/迈阿密等机房,E3-1240V6/64GB内存/1TB SSD硬盘/DDOS/150TB流量/1Gbps带宽/DDOS,$95/月，...
vcpd为你推荐
-
985和211哪个好985大学好 还是211是什么意思手机浏览器哪个好手机浏览器哪个好？手机浏览器哪个好用？宝来和朗逸哪个好宝来和朗逸哪个好网校哪个好哪个网校比较好？oppo和vivo哪个好vivo和oppo建议买哪个红茶和绿茶哪个好红茶和绿茶哪个比较好？雅思和托福哪个好考托福好考还是雅思好考？网络机顶盒哪个好机顶盒哪个好用云盘哪个好网盘哪个好用？美国国际集团美国AIG股票,值得长远投资吗??