尼康佳能和尼康哪个好啊（Canon and nikon which is good）

佳能和尼康哪个好啊Canon and nikon which is goodCanon and nikon which is good

The 2008-11-22 23:59

This is a matter of opinion. Personally, I think two brands have advantages, and it' s best to combine the advantages.

The difference is not just the fuselage, but the rest is important too. From the camera, I f irmly believe that nikon has the absolute advantage. Not only is the advanced lens quality excellent, the cheap lens also has good quality, this Canon can be improved.

For those who don't have any experience (regardless of equipment and usage) , nikon is highly recommended.

All good, Canon is more specialized, the middle and low end of the nikon is more suitable for home use.

Canon, personal feeling, the imaging effect is more exquisite,the distortion is small.

It' s all right. I think Canon is better.

The single anti-canon nikon has its own characteristics, each of which is half the sky, and the card has to say that Canon is a notch above.

Every thing has its own way!

Professionally, Canon' s fuselage does well, nikon' s camera does well.

Consumer camera, Canon is more advantageous, the dominant position of IXUS series is unrivaled.

In the image, the image of Canon is soft, similar to the skin effect of Photoshop; Nikon is sharp, so it' s better to be a good person, better to shoot the scenery nikon!

You should say consumer cameras:

The feeling of a human being can choose Canon

Pay attention to the scenery choice nikon, but the nikon consumer camera processing speed slightly slower!

Is very good. I can't say who' s better. If you're buying a regular digital camera, you might as well choose the Canon.If you buy a SLR camera, both of these brands are excellent.The key depends on your awareness of the two brands.

I know a friend who USES nikon. A picture is better than a good one.

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

-- -- -- -- --

Nikon D5100 and Canon 600D which one is good?

No doubt, it must be D5100 better!

Don' t be too many words, I am not easy to type, please read carefully, you basically know how to choose!

Reason one: have D5100 nikon advanced "optical focal linkage system", that is to say, in continuous shooting mode, you taken the dynamic subject, focus onyou first selectedfocus position all the time, will not change because of the moving object, the function is very useful, called "continuous autofocus" and "3d tracking focus". However, there are no similar functions in Canon SLR series, including 5D2, with only "single autofocus"and "manual servo auto focus", which is one more than D5100 in terms of focusing performance.

Second reason: since nikon' s release, it has been very rare to hear that nikon' s own lens has been used on the fuselage of its own fuselage, which can cause the phenomenon of running coke,and only the electronic contact of the accessory factory lens is not compatible with the problem. And Canon SLR 40 d, 50 d,60 d, 550 d, 600 d, several models have run the focal problems,40 d, 50 d, 600 d is particularly serious, anduse is Canon their standard prime lens, let alone with deputy factory lens.Reason 3: the image processing system of D5100, with the use of the "Ed" 2 generation, is faster than the one with the middle end D90. The high sensitivity of D5100 was ISO6400, and the EV expanded to 25600. The high sense of the 60D is ISO: 3200, and the extension is 12800.

The D5100 is 60D better than 60D.

Reason four: the D5100 viewfinder is a five prism, while 600D USES five lenses; Of course, the two functions are exactly the same, but the five prisms are more accurate and brighter. There is also a certain C powder argument that the five-sided mirror is more scientific yunyun than the five prism, so why not use five mirror on 5D2? In this detail, Canon is very stingy.Reason 5: the problem of lens group, in fact, choose the starter model, there is no need to think about the lens group, the cloud is powerful ! In the many lenses of the two big camera brands,the lenses that can actually be used on the gateway are nothing more than a few sets of heads and headers. You can't have a gold ring on the D5100; It' s also impossible to match the red circle on the 60D. From the head and part of the low-end lens, the overall quality of the low-end camera is much better, at least willing to put a piece of ED mirror in the sleeve.

Looking at the 3rd floor, CMOS is the first research and development of Canon?Youwere wrong on the 3rd floor. The truth is that the first company to develop a CCD was SONY. The first company to develop CMOS was kodak. Both SONY CMOS and Canon' s CMOS, and Intel processors, are made using the nikon 22nanometer lithography mechanism. Nikon does not mean they don't build CMOS don't master the technology, nikon CMOS design,entrust the SONY manufacturing, design patents owned by nikon,is not hard to understand why nikon two years earlier than SONY the whole picture?

"The strongest in CMOS is Canon", which is bullshit. The most powerful CMOS in the CMOS are the Danish f lying one, pentax 654D,and D3X over 1DM3 in the whole picture.

In the lens, nikon' s relationship with Canon is a mentoring relationship. Nikon is amaster, and his apprentice is a Canon.The earliest Canon is a camera fuselage, not a camera, and a nikon camera. To say the most brilliant period of Canon lens is developed from 60 s fluorite elements (L) , but in the early 70 s, as ED nikon lenses "lanthanum corona (LaK) synthesis"research and development success, the Canon of fluorite lens honor than ever! The nikon ED flakes are not only catching up to the fluorite lenses, but the hardness and refractive index are higher than that of fluorite. Canon, of course, also have the corresponding development, it is developed UD piece, is used to replace expensive fluorite elements, but with nikon' s patent restrictions, it is impossible in the UD piece over ED on the optical properties.

With regard to the nikon high-end camera, we have to mention the nikon nano-coating, which is called the 4th largest coating in the field of light, which greatly improves the optical pass rate and reduces glare and reflection. However, the Canon' s SWC coating only buys some of the coating technology of the pentax SMC, which is improved. The so-called Canon lens "meat" and nikon lens "sharp"are not without data to be found. Put it this way, the Japanese camera can be called off with the head of the board, which is pentax and nikon.

Also: the DxoMark lab test data basically illustrates CMOS quality problems, and if you have other, more authoritative

electronic optical testing facilities, you can take a test and rebut the DxoMark data.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

=

1. Say nikon lens is expensive to have no basis at all, nikon' s 18-105 is much cheaper than Canon 18-135.

The sensor Canon lags behind because of the earlier relationship. I think it' s betternot to have abrandpreference in the answer, or it will mislead the questioner. In my opinion,these two basic hands, I won't say that the money is better,but it is more suitable for the landlord.

2. At the low end, no special focus is good, CAM1000 is not a powerful focusing system, 600D is not, simply said, 1.4/1.8 is basically run. I've seen Canon nikon.

3. High sense is D5100, a good one or so, but the comparison of ISO scope is a serious unscientific method!

4, d5100 and 600d are all 5 mirrors, and the data on one website seems to be wrong.

Low-end lens nikon is a bit more affordable.

6. The problem of cmos is clearly misunderstood, and I said that the Canon of 18 megapixel cmos is first out, and SONY' s 16million sensors are out.

Nikon D3s/D3 /D700, D3100 CMOS is SONY' s SONY, the D3x and all the aps-c sensors are SONY' s, at least the SONY logo.Of course, I'mnot saying that nikon and SONY are not good, D5100CMOS is leading, I support, but I don't see particularly prominent place, not like you say so exaggerated, that' s all.Speaking of the lithography machine, nikon has, Canon also has,this is the main business of optical big factory now.(lithography is the core equipment of large scale integrated circuit production, manufacturing and maintenance requires a great deal of optical and electronic industrial base, only a few manufacturers to master in the world. So the lithography is expensive, usually from $3000 to $500 million. )

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

All kinds of Canon, nikon' s running condition

From the accuracy of focus, it is certain that nikon is better than Canon. You can hear it in their propaganda terms: the Canon says: quick focus, nikon says: accurate focus.

Nikon and Canon have different focus methods. Nikon USES successive approximations, and it has three and a half weeks of approaching, but it' s a bit slower than Canon, but the focus is much better.

When it comes to running, the Canon is a little bit more, because Canon emphasizes speed, and I say it' s called a positionmethod

(the name is me) especially when it' s more frequent and more frequent.

How serious is this problem in recent generations?

To be sure, it should be said that the problem is not large,and that if the camera is greatly affected, there is a problem with the camera sales. Don't absolutize some of the questions,as you ask, it' s not 50 or 100, but 97 and 98. So the people who bought the camera didn't pay much attention to it, and the Canon was still far better than nikon.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

= = =

Nikon' s lens is compared to Canon' s lens except for the focus speed. What else?

The nicol lens is better than Canon in many fields, first with all the nikon SLRS, whether the filmor the digital F card, Canon doesn't.

Then nicole' s nanocrystalline coating world no. 1, no better than it to deal with glare, artificial fluorite or whatever.And then nicol has a very high level of sharpness,

Especially the professional golden circle lens, each is sharp and incomparable, the sharp end of the photo shoot is simple and easy, the later sharpness of the meat of the photo is needed to be very deep digital attainments.

Then the nikkor lens has a more solid structure, and does not blindly pursue the size, although it is like Canon to make the lens of large, the swelling of the face to fill the fat feeling.Then nicole' s lens has a very good quality, all kinds of craftsmanship and workmanship are very good, leather is durable and reliable, unlike the Canon of melodramatic.

Then the nikkel camera has a gorgeous and unique color,especially for the photo shoot of the scenery.

Finally nikkor lens imaging quality particularly bad (I was compared with prices) , each kind of lens is worth, in contrast,the Canon is not, a lot of cheap shot doing special special rotten, price is not cheap, nicole 600 of more than 50 F1.8 D imaging quality is very good.

I've been using nikon and nicole since the film age, and I've used it all the time and I've never felt dissatisfied, not perfect, but not so much.

Nikon f triple double have ruled the earth for a long time, 14and 24 is the best in the world of ultra wide Angle lens, 24-70is worthy of the emperor of world standard zoom, 70-200 small bamboo gun reputation is no one can and more, the Canon is 70-200can also slightly and nikon than, the other two difference is not a packet, to know the three lens is the most commonly used and most of manufacturer' s technical level.

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --