scientificletitbe吉他谱

letitbe吉他谱  时间:2021-01-15  阅读:()
HALId:hal-01467803https://hal.
inria.
fr/hal-01467803Submittedon14Feb2017HALisamulti-disciplinaryopenaccessarchiveforthedepositanddisseminationofsci-entificresearchdocuments,whethertheyarepub-lishedornot.
ThedocumentsmaycomefromteachingandresearchinstitutionsinFranceorabroad,orfrompublicorprivateresearchcenters.
L'archiveouvertepluridisciplinaireHAL,estdestinéeaudéptetàladiffusiondedocumentsscientifiquesdeniveaurecherche,publiésounon,émanantdesétablissementsd'enseignementetderecherchefranaisouétrangers,deslaboratoirespublicsouprivés.
DistributedunderaCreativeCommonsAttribution|4.
0InternationalLicenseWhyNotLetITFailTheITProjectSuccessParadoxPaulAmbrose,DavidMunroTocitethisversion:PaulAmbrose,DavidMunro.
WhyNotLetITFailTheITProjectSuccessParadox.
International-WorkingConferenceonTransferandDiffusionofIT(TDIT),Jun2013,Bangalore,India.
pp.
579-582,10.
1007/978-3-642-38862-0_37.
hal-01467803adfa,p.
1,2011.
Springer-VerlagBerlinHeidelberg2011WhyNotLetITFailTheITProjectSuccessParadoxPaulJ.
Ambrose,DavidMunroUniversityofWisconsin-Whitewater,Whitewater,WI53190,USAambrosep@uww.
edu,munrod@uww.
eduAbstract.
IsafocusoninformationsystemsorinformationtechnologysuccessamyopicviewofevaluatingITsuccessandfailureAresuccessandfailuretheoppositeendsofacontinuumforevaluatingITprojectsConventionalmeasuresofsuccesssuchasmeetingcost,time,budgets,anduserneedsdonotaddresspositivesthatcanemergefromfailures.
WecontendthatafocusonsuccessandfailingtofactorthepossibilityoffailureactuallyhamperITpro-jects.
Anorganizationalmandatethatdoesnotallowforfailuredoesnotpro-moterisktakingandinnovation.
Itcanalsofosteraprojectclimatefraughtwithundesirableorunethicalbehaviorandstressamongdevelopers,whilefailingtocapturepositivelessonsthatcouldemergefromITprojectfailure.
Keywords:ISsuccessevaluation,ITfailure,innovation1IntroductionSocialandbusinessnormsexpectsuccessateverythingwedo-atwork,atplay,andathome.
Asasocietywerememberwinnersandnotlosers.
Wedorememberfail-ures,thoughnotinthesamepositivesenseasweglorifysuccesses.
Itisnodifferentwhenitcomestoevaluating,orsettingexpectationsforIT(InformationTechnology)projects.
Successismandatedexplicitlyorimplicitlybyprojectstakeholders.
Per-hapsthatexpectationisjustifiable.
Afterallbusinessstakeholdersinvesttime,effortandmonetaryresourcesinITprojectsandasgoodstewardsofbusinesscapital,havearightfulexpectationofprojectsuccessdefinedbytheprojectmeetingitssetobjec-tivesandgoals.
Butthenthefocusjustonimmediateprojectsuccesscouldbetoonarrowaworldview,andonecanevenarguethatthiscouldbedetrimentalespeciallyfortheoverallorlongtermsuccessofanorganization.
Afteralldoesn'ttheoldadage"Failureisthesteppingstoneforsuccess"seemtoencouragenotwillfulactionsthatprecipitatefailurebutthelatitudetomakemistakessothatwemaylearnfromsucherrorsandconsequentlybecomebetterOrbecomemoresuccessfulinthelongrunThepassiontoevaluateITsuccessinIS(InformationSystems)academicresearch,howeverelusivethatevaluationmaybe,couldbetracedtoearlyinfluencesonthedisciplinethatoriginatedinthescientificcomputingfoundationsandthoughts.
Shan-nonandWeaver'sseminal1949work"AMathematicalTheoryofCommunication"setthestageandstandardsforinformationprocessingwiththefocusbeingonthefidelityofinformationasitmovesfromthesourcetodestination,andconsequentlyimprovingtechnicalaspectsofcommunication.
AtthecoreofDeLoneandMcLean's1992and2003synthesizingworkofpastattemptstoevaluateISsuccesswefindShannonandWeaver'sthesisontechnicalcommunication.
DeLoneandMcLean'sISsuccessconstructsandtheirderivativescontinuetoplayasignificantroleinthemeasurementofITsuccessinISliterature.
Howeveritisironicthatamodelwiththeoreticalrootsinscienceandengineeringisattemptingtoaddressaproblemthatissocialsciencesinnature.
Thedangerofthisapproachisthatwecouldbemissingbehavioralfactorsthatneedtobeaddressedgroundupinatheoreticalmodelratherthanthesefactorsbeinggraftedontopofascientificmodel.
OnemaywonderwhysuchadeterministictechnicalapproachtoevaluationIS/ITprojectsuccessisbeingcriticized,asafteralldon'tweneedasystematicapproachtoevaluatesuccessThecountertothatargumenthoweveristwofold.
Firstthetime,size,andcostandeffortaredifficulttodetermineattheprojectinitiationstageasITprojectsfollowthe"hurricane"model(Dennisetal,2009,pg82)wherethesepa-rameterscanbebetterestimatedonlywhentheprojectiswellunderway,justastheactuallandingsitesofhurricanesareknownonlyafterlandfall.
Second,IThasbeenakeyenablerofbusinesstransformation,andITledtransformationprojectsareinher-entlyhighrisk,highrewardprojectswherethepossibilityoffailureisimplicitandintegraltotheproject.
Ignoringfailurecanleadtonotlearningfromsuchexperiencesandsetthestageforthesamemistakestobecommittedagain.
Todigabitdeeperintothissubject,letusconsiderthreespecificareaswhereafocuspurelyonsuccessandfailingtofactorthepossibilityoffailureinapositivemannerisnotdesirableforITprojects.
2CentralArguments2.
1Successobsessionhindersinnovation:Aholisticapproachtodevelopingprojectsandservicesthatmeetamyriadofstake-holderneedscouldbeaddressedfromtheperspectiveofdesignthinking.
TimBrownelaboratesthecoreprinciplesbehinddesignthinkingtoincludefeasibility(itisfunc-tionallypossibletodelivertheneedsusingtechnology),desirability(doestheprojectmakesensetousers)andviability(canitbeasustainablebusinessmodel).
Further,designthinkingespouseanorganizationalculturethataccepts"forgiveness"laterthanaskingfor"permission"ahead.
Thisisessentialtofosterinnovationbyencouragingrisktakingwhichcanalsoleadtomistakesbeingmade.
HoweverifthebusinessmandateisforITprojectstomeettime,scopeandcost,pertraditionalprojectman-agementprinciples,ITprofessionalarelikelytoadoptariskaversestrategythatcurbsinnovation.
CurrentIS/ITsuccessmodelsseemtofailtotakethisintoaccount.
Inaddition,developershaveadisincentiveforbeinginnovativeindevelopmentapproaches,methodsortoolswhensuccessisdeterminedforthetraditionalperspec-tivecurrentlybeingfollowed.
Insomecasesthisreluctancetobeinnovateisbecausethebenefitsarenotyetwellknownandmayinfactmaynotexist.
The"letsomeoneelsetryitfirst"approachissafer.
Furthermorechangesduetoaninnovationthatisintroducedinaprocesswillintroducenewriskfactorstotheproject,thusmakingithardertoevaluatetheriskandtrade-offsofdoingtheinnovation,whichleadstopro-jectmanagersviewingtheseinnovationsasunnecessaryrisks.
Perhapsthebiggestreasontodiscouragethemistheveryfactthatimplementingtheinnovationwilltaketimeawayfromthe'actualproject'.
Forexamplethelearningcurvealonewilllikelytakemoretimeonthisprojectthentheinnovationwillprovideonthisproject.
Itisnotsurprisingthatofteninnovationhastoforcedtopdownbyupperlevelmanage-ment,whenmostoftenitwouldbemoreeffectiveandcheaperfortheorganizationtohaveitariseorganicallyfromthebottomup.
2.
2Successobsessioncanfosterunhealthystress:Let'sstartbyexamininghowthestresspeoplefeelgetsplayedout.
Ithastobenotedthatthestressindividualfeelaboutavoidingfailureisnotuniformandwillvarygreatlybymanyfactorsincludingtheirworkexperience,personality,andfactorout-sideofworktojustnameafew.
Howeverwewouldbenaivetoassumethatatleastsomeifnotmostoftheindividualsonadevelopmenteffortfeelalotofpressureforaprojecttosucceed,oratleastnotbethecauseofitfailing.
Whiletheconceptofaprofessionalathlete"chokingunderpressure"hasbeenstudiedfordecades,SandersandWalia(2012)haveshownextendedtheeconomictheorythatthisisnotlimitedtoathletes.
Toquotefromtheirconclusion"Pressuremayreducenotonlyreducepro-ductiveoutputbut,morefundamentally,mayerodeincentivestoputforthproductiveinput"Whilethestressmaycausesomepeopletounderperformothersmayleavetheorganizationwhentheirstresslevelsaretoohigh.
Asaperson'sstressfromworkspillsovertotheirpersonallivestheyareoftenencouragedbyconcernedfamilyandfriendstoconsiderlookingforalessstressfuljobenvironment.
Whenthisdoeshap-penandanindividualleavesaprojecttheremainingpeopleontheprojectareleftwithmorestressfromeitherhavingtopickuptheworkoftheindividualwholeavesorincommunicatingandbringinguptospeedthepersonwhoreplacethem.
Athirdwaypeoplecandealwithstressistojustgiveuptryingtomeetwhattheyperceiveasunrealisticexpectationsthatarethrustuponthem.
Thatistheybasicallydealwiththestressoffailurebyassumingitisinevitableandhencedowhattheycanbutnotreallywholeheartedlythrowthemselvesintotheproject.
2.
3Successobsessioncanmotivateundesiredbehavior:Austin(2001)highlightstheeffectoftimepressureondeveloperswheredeveloperswereknowntotakeshortcutswhiledealingwithunanticipatedprojectcomplications,eveniftheseshortcutsarenotinthebestinterestoftheproject.
Austinshowcasesanexamplewheredevelopersdeliberatelyplanteda"bug"inthesoftwarethatwouldbuythemtimetodomoreworkintheprojectwhentheproject"breaks"duringpro-ductiondeployment.
Soholdingdownpeopletohardsuccessmeasurescouldencour-agethemtocircumventboundariesthatcouldbeconsideredasbeingunethical.
Thisisnotanisolatedreport.
Zelazny(2011)reportedbasedonasurveythat"softwaredevelopmentteammembersdonotconsidertheinternalqualityattributesofmodifia-bility,portability,andreusabilitywhenconsideringaninformationsystemsdevelop-mentprojectsuccessful.
"Consideringthatthedevelopmentteammembersarethepeoplewhomostbenefitfromtheseattributesintheirday-to-dayworkshowsthedegreeinwhichtheareatakesbackseatinpursuitofsuccess.
3ConclusionSowheredoesthisallleadtoThebottomlinequestionwouldbe,howdoweposi-tivelyaddressITfailuresaspartofITsuccessevaluationThemotivationistoen-courageITprofessionaltoworkinnovativelyandtakenecessaryrisksandbeproac-tivecontributorsonprojects.
AtechnicalanddeterministicviewofISsuccessmaynotbetherightsolutiontomeetthatend.
ShouldwethendevelopamodelforISfailurethansuccessReferences1.
Austin,R.
D.
,Theeffectsoftimepressureonqualityinsoftwaredevelopment:Anagencymodel.
InformationSystemsResearch,2001.
12(2):p.
195-207.
2.
Brown,T.
andB.
Katz,Changebydesign:howdesignthinkingtransformsorganizationsandinspiresinnovation.
1sted.
2009,NewYork:HarperBusiness.
viii,264p.
3.
DeLone,W.
H.
andE.
R.
McLean,InformationSystemsSuccess:TheQuestfortheDe-pendentVariable.
InformationSystemsResearch,1992.
3(1):p.
60-95.
4.
DeLone,W.
H.
andE.
R.
McLean,TheDeLoneandMcLeanModelofInformationSys-temsSuccess:ATen-YearUpdate.
JournalofManagementInformationSystems,2003.
19(4):p.
9-30.
5.
Dennis,A.
,B.
H.
Wixom,andD.
P.
Tegarden,Systemsanalysisdesign,UMLversion2.
0:anobject-orientedapproach.
3rded.
2009,Hoboken,NJ:J.
Wiley.
xviii,581p.
6.
Sanders,S.
,WalisB.
,"Shirkingand'choking'underincentive-basedpressure:Abehav-ioraleconomictheoryofperformanceproduction",EconomicsLetters,Volume116,Issue3,September2012,Pages363–3667.
Shannon,C.
E.
andW.
Weaver,Themathematicaltheoryofcommunication.
1949,Urba-na,:UniversityofIllinoisPress.
125.
8.
Zelazny,LucianM.
,"TowardaTheoryofInformationSystemDevelopmentSuccess:PerceptionsofSoftwareDevelopmentTeamMembers",June8,2011Dissertation,Virgin-iaPolytechnicInstitute.

SugarHosts糖果主机六折 云服务器五折

也有在上个月介绍到糖果主机商12周年的促销活动,我有看到不少的朋友还是选择他们家的香港虚拟主机和美国虚拟主机比较多,同时有一个网友有联系到推荐入门的个人网站主机,最后建议他选择糖果主机的迷你主机方案,适合单个站点的。这次商家又推出所谓的秋季活动促销,这里一并整理看看这个服务商在秋季活动中有哪些值得选择的主机方案,比如虚拟主机最低可以享受六折,云服务器可以享受五折优惠。 官网地址:糖果主机秋季活动促...

hostio荷兰10Gbps带宽,10Gbps带宽,€5/月,最低配2G内存+2核+5T流量

成立于2006年的荷兰Access2.IT Group B.V.(可查:VAT: NL853006404B01,CoC: 58365400) 一直运作着主机周边的业务,当前正在对荷兰的高性能AMD平台的VPS进行5折优惠,所有VPS直接砍一半。自有AS208258,vps母鸡配置为Supermicro 1024US-TRT 1U,2*AMD Epyc 7452(64核128线程),16条32G D...

819云互联(800元/月),香港BGP E5 2650 16G,日本 E5 2650 16G

819云互联 在本月发布了一个购买香港,日本独立服务器的活动,相对之前的首月活动性价比更高,最多只能享受1个月的活动 续费价格恢复原价 是有些颇高 这次819云互联与机房是合作伙伴 本次拿到机房 活动7天内购买独立服务器后期的长期续费价格 加大力度 确实来说这次的就可以买年付或者更长时间了…本次是5个机房可供选择,独立服务器最低默认是50M带宽,不限制流量,。官网:https://ww...

letitbe吉他谱为你推荐
企业虚拟主机购买虚拟主机要注意些什么?企业网站有什么好的虚拟主机推荐吗?虚拟主机代理紧急寻求好的虚拟主机代理商海外主机如何选择优质的海外主机?英文域名中文域名和英文域名的区别? 越详细越好域名主机域名,主机空间和网站文件三者之间的区别是什么域名备案买域名要备案吗网站空间价格我想自己弄个小网站,但我不会懂域名和买空间价格,便宜一点的一共要多少钱?100m虚拟主机万网和新网虚拟主机有100M的吗论坛虚拟主机论坛虚拟主机的IP地址在后台的那个地方呀深圳虚拟主机深圳有哪些比较有名气的网络推广公司
中文域名申请 汉邦高科域名申请 万网域名管理 万网域名证书查询 主机优惠码 westhost 息壤备案 轻博客 搜狗抢票助手 本网站在美国维护 seednet 双线主机 91vps 空间合租 能外链的相册 上海电信测速 美国盐湖城 摩尔庄园注册 阿里云邮箱登陆 腾讯网盘 更多