requiredwww.kanav001.com

www.kanav001.com  时间:2021-03-19  阅读:()
REVIEWInnovativepayerengagementstrategies:willtheconvergenceleadtobettervaluecreationinpersonalizedmedicineIldarAkhmetov1&RostyslavV.
Bubnov2,3Publishedonline:13February2017#TheAuthor(s)2017.
ThisarticleispublishedwithopenaccessatSpringerlink.
comAbstractBackgroundAsreimbursementauthoritiesaregaininggreaterpowertoinfluencetheprescriptionbehaviorofphysicians,itremainscriticalforlifesciencecompaniesfocusingonper-sonalizedmedicinetodevelop"tailor-made"payerengage-mentstrategiestosecurereimbursementandassuretimelypatientaccesstotheirinnovativeproducts.
Dependingonthetypesofsuchengagement,pharmaceuticalanddiagnosticcompaniesmaybenefitbyobtainingaccesstomedicalandpharmacyclaimsdata,gettinginvaluableupfrontinputsonevidencerequirementsandclinicaltrialdesign,andstrength-eningtrustbypayers,thereforeavoidinguncertaintieswithregardstopricing,reimbursement,andresearchanddevelop-mentreinvestment.
Thisarticleaimstostudytheevolvingtrendofpartneringamongtwointerdependent,yetconfronting,stakeholdergroups—payersandproducers—aswellastoidentifythemostpromisingpayerengagementstrat-egiesbasedoncocreationofvalueintroducedbylifesciencecompaniesinthepastfewyears.
Weanalyzedtherecentcasestudiesfromboththerapeuticanddiagnosticrealmsconsid-eredasthe"bestpractices"inpayerengagement.
Thelast5yearswereabreakoutperiodfordealsbetweenlifesciencecompaniesandreimbursementauthoritiesintheareaofper-sonalizedmedicinewithanumberoffelicitouscollaborativepracticesestablishedalready,andmanymoreyettoemerge.
Wesuggestthattherearemanywaysforproducersandpayerstocollaboratethroughouttheproductlifecycle—fromdataexchangeandscientificcounselingtoresearchcollaborationaimedatreducinghealthcarecosts,addressingadherenceis-sues,anddiminishingrisksassociatedwithfuturelaunches.
ConclusionsThepresentedcasestudiesprovideclearinsightsonhowsuccessfulpersonalizedmedicinecompaniescustom-izetheirstate-of-the-artpayerengagementstrategiestoensurecloserproximitywithpayersandestablishlonger-termtrust-basedrelationships.
KeywordsPredictivepreventivepersonalizedmedicine.
Payerengagementstrategy.
Valuecreation.
Marketaccess.
ReimbursementBackgroundTheemergenceofcomparativeeffectivenessresearchandtheshiftofthehealthcareindustrytowardnoveloutcome-basedpaymentmodelshaveputdiagnosticandpharmaceuticalcom-paniesinalessconvenient,yetpropitious,positioninperson-alized(andso-calledprecision)medicine.
Ononehand,theneedtoprovideconvincingevidenceforthesuperiorityoftherapeutic,diagnostic,ordrugdeliverysolutionsovertheexistingalternativeshasescalateddevelopmentalcostsandcreatedadditionalmarketaccesscomplexities.
Ontheotherhand,companiesthatareabletojustifythevalueoftheirproductsbydemonstratingameasurabledifferentiationvis-à-viscompetitorshavealuxurytoenjoyhighpremiumsandgainuniquecompetitiveadvantagetoalargeextentdueto*RostyslavV.
Bubnovrostbubnov@gmail.
comIldarAkhmetovildar.
export@gmail.
com1StrategicMarketIntelligenceDepartment,Unicorn,P.
O.
Box91,Zhytomyr10020,Ukraine2ClinicalHospital"Pheophania"ofStateAffairsDepartment,ZabolotnyStr.
,21,Kyiv03680,Ukraine3ZabolotnyInstituteofMicrobiologyandVirology,NationalAcademyofSciencesofUkraine,ZabolotnyStr.
,154,Kyiv03680,UkraineEPMAJournal(2017)8:5–15DOI10.
1007/s13167-017-0078-6moreextensivereimbursementandwiderstakeholderacceptance.
Consideringheterogeneityofstakeholderneeds,diversityoftoolstoquantifyvalueofproducts,andbreadthofpossibleclinicalandnonclinicalevidence,itremainscriticalforinno-vativecompanieswithfocusonpersonalizedmedicinetopart-nerwithinstitutionalcustomers,particularlypayers,tocreatethealignedincentivesandsupportthenecessarycapabilitiestomakevalue-baseddealswork.
Dependingonthetypesofsuchcollaboration,lifesciencecompaniesmaybenefitbyobtainingaccesstomedicalandpharmacyclaimsdata,gettinginvaluableupfrontinputsonevidencerequirementsandclinicaltrialdesign,andstrengtheningtrustbypayers,there-foreavoidinguncertaintieswithregardstopricingandreimbursement.
Therecentsurveyconductedamong75managedcareex-ecutivesintheUSAshowedthatpartneringbetweenpayersandbiopharmabecomesaprevailingwindintheindustrywithmorethan70%ofrespondentsrecognizingvalueintheearlystagecollaboration[1].
Notwithstandingthatpayersrecognizethevitalityofpharmadatapresentedupfront,only31%ofthepayersclaimtotakepartinphaseIIIclinicaltrials,andlessthanaquarterinvolveintheearlierphasetesting.
Thereasonsforsuchdiscrepancyaremultifold:lackoftrustinmanufac-turers,pharma'sunderestimationoftheimportanceofearlystakeholderengagement,andevenmoresotheinabilityoftheindustrytonavigatethetwotopmostpayerchallenges—complianceandcostcontainment.
Theaforementionedsignifiesthatthereisacleargapinthewaytheindustryandpayersinteract,makingitexceedinglydifficultforbothpartiestorealizethefullpotentialoftheirconvergence.
However,italsoimpliesthetremendousoppor-tunitiesforpharmaceuticalanddiagnosticcompaniesfocusingonprecisionmedicinetoaddressthisgapbydesigningandimplementingmoresophisticatedprecompetitiveprogramsinvolvingpayersinthematureandfast-growingmarkets.
Thispaperaimstostudytheevolvingtrendforpartneringamongthetwointerdependent,yetconfronting,stakeholdergroups—payersandproducers—aswellastoidentifythemostpromisingpayerengagementstrategiesbasedoncocreationofvalueintroducedbycompanieswithfocusonpersonalizedmedicineinthepastfewyears.
ThegrowinginfluenceofpayersandinnovationcrisisThedramaticspikeinhealthcarecostsovertimehasputanenormouspressureonpayerstotoughenthereimbursementcriteriaforpharmaceuticalanddiagnosticproductsinthede-velopedandemergingmarkets.
Exertinggreaterinfluenceontheglobalhealthcareecosystem,payers(governments,phar-macybenefitsmanagers,publicandprivateinsuranceplans,andmanagedcareorganizations)havesetupanunspokenrulethatobtainingFDA,EMA,orCEapprovalnolongerprovidesthelifesciencecompanieswithaprivilegetochargepremiumpricesandsecurereimbursement.
Today,reimbursementauthoritiesaredemandingaddition-alevidencethatgoesfarbeyondthecustomarysafetyandefficacydata,incorporatingrelativecost-effectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysesintheirformularydecisions.
Asaresult,innovativecompaniescontinuesufferingfromintensedrop-offsinpositivedecisionsfornewproductreimbursement.
Thus,outof102cancerdrugindicationsappraisedbytheNationalInstituteforHealthandCareExcellence(NICE)be-tween2007and2014,only47(46%)werefullyorpartiallyrecommendedforNHScommissioning[2].
SimilarnumberswereobservedinGermanyintheperiodof2011–2014,whereInstituteforQualityandEfficiencyinHealthCare(IQWIG)determinedthat50%oftheassessednewdrugsoffered"noadditionalbenefit"vis-à-viscomparators[3].
Moreover,sub-stantialprivateandpublicreimbursementrejectionswereev-idencedamongmoleculardiagnosticandtherapeuticcompa-niesintheUSAandAustraliaparticularlyduetotheinabilitytojustifyvalue-for-money[4,5].
Recognizingthegrowinginfluenceofpayersandaccount-ingforthedirectcorrelationofinsurancepremiumswiththeescalatingmedicinalcosts,largemedicalsocieties,suchasAmericanSocietyofClinicalOncology(ASCO)andAmericanHeartAssociation(AHA),arenowconsideringonincorporatingcostsor"financialtoxicity"asanotherimpor-tantperspectiveintheguidelines[6,7].
Theriseinhealthcareexpenditurehasalsocreatedmuchanxietyamidphysiciansinthecountrieswhereretirementbenefitorotherfinancialincen-tivesareaffectedbyoverprescribing[8].
Withpressurefrompublicandprivatepayers,thecost-sensitiveprescribersbe-comelessandlessinfluentialintheirclinicaldecisionsoftengivingpreferencestocheaperandlesseffectiveoptionsoverhighlyeffectivetherapeuticsanddiagnosticsthatarenotcov-eredbyhealthplans.
Forexample,intheNetherlands,75%ofthetotaldrugs(includingHerceptin)inabout1/3oftheDutchhospitalswereuncoveredbythehealthcareinsuranceinthemid-2000s,leadingtounequalaccesstohighlyeffectiveandcostlymedicines[9].
Anditisonlythe7-yearHerculeaneffortofthetwopatientadvocacygroups—theDutchBreastCancerAssociationandtheDutchFederationofCancerPatientOrganizations—thatchangedthestatusquoofHerceptin,eventhoughthefinalimpactonthecostcontrolandreim-bursementproceduresintheNetherlandswerestillnotachieved.
Whiletheeconomicexpediencyandethicsassociatedwithpayer-guidedhealthcareprovisionarenotthatstraightforwardandarealwayssubjecttolengthydebates,itisquiteobviousandparticularlycriticalthatasignificantundervaluationof6EPMAJournal(2017)8:5–15diagnosticsandtherapeuticsbymeansofseverepricingandreimbursementrestrictionsleadstoanunderincentivizedin-novation.
AccordingtoThomsonReutersandDeloittejointsurvey,thecostofbringinganewmedicinefromdiscoverytolaunchhasescalatedfromUSD1.
1billionin2010toUSD1.
3billionin2013(+18%).
Moreover,theburdenoflatestagefailureswasestimatedtodeprivethetop12pharmacompa-niesofUSD243billionin2010–2013[10].
Asinnovativecompaniesprioritizetheirportfoliosbasedoncommercialexpectations,healthinsurancereimbursementlevelsarethekeyeconomicsignalsforinnovatorstodeter-minewhetherthelikelymarketforanewdiagnosticorthera-peuticwillbelargeenoughtosubstantiatecostlyinvestments.
Hence,bearinghighmarginalcostsandgettinglowincentivesfrompayers,today,profit-driveninnovativecompaniesbe-comemorerigidinrevisingtheirpipelineassetsintermsofreimbursementattractiveness,frequentlylimitingpatientac-cesstohigh-qualityproductsforfearofacoveragefiasco.
Thus,intheearly2000s,severallargepharmaceuticalcom-panieshaveabandonedantibioticsresearchandinvestmentprioritizingdrugsinotherclasses,suchascancerandheartdisease.
Thisresultedinthefactthatresistancetoexistingmedicinescontinuedtoincrease,whilethenumberofnewantibioticsreceivingFDAapprovaldeclined[11,12].
In2014,theproblemwasaddressedbythePresident'sCouncilofAdvisorsonScienceandTechnologythatassembledmis-cellaneousstakeholderstocreatenewalignedincentivesfacil-itatingresearchanddevelopment(R&D)inantibiotics[13].
Allofthesesuggestthatthecurrentapproachtohealthcarecoverageisimbalancedand,inlightofthegrowinginfluenceofpayers,itiscrucialtorevisetheway"innovation"isdefinedandvaluated,outliningunambiguousincentivesforthelifesciencecompaniestocontinuereinvestingintoR&D.
"Perasperaadastra"—innovativepayerengagementstrategiesInthepastseveralyears,thelifesciencecompanieshavebeenresponsivetothenewpayerrolebymeansofexpandingtheirmarketaccessandregionalsalesteamstotargetthespecificreimbursementaccounts,collectingmoredataonpayer"painpoints"anddecision-makingprocesses,customizingcoreval-uedossierstothelocalpayerneeds,andallocatingsubstantialfundsonlocalizedreal-worldevidencestudies.
Althoughim-portant,thesestrategiesprovidecompanieswithonlyincre-mentalbenefits,anddonotallowthenecessaryproximitywithreimbursementauthorities.
Hence,toachievesuchprox-imity,companiesshouldhavemoreopendialoguesandtightercollaborationwithpayersbasedontrustandcocreationofvalue(Fig.
1).
Reimbursementauthorities,uncertainofwhatmanufac-turershaveintheirpipelines,generallyappreciateearlydialogueswiththelifesciencecompaniestobemoreinformedaboutimpendinglaunchesandtheassociatedadditionalbud-getloads.
Inresponse,companiesareabletoaddresstheirquestionsandcreatemoreclarityonwhattheycandotomakethepipelineandmarketedtherapeuticsmoreattractivefromapayerperspective.
Yet,despiteofmarketaccessandcommer-cialteamscreatingamyriadofbrilliantideasonhowtopart-nerwithreimbursementauthorities,therearealwaysethicalandregulatoryconstraintsaboutgoingbeyondtheconven-tionalunitprice-basedrelationshipsandco-pays.
Oneoftheprimeconcernsofthehealthcarestakeholdersregardingtheindustry–payerpartnershipsistransparency.
ToaddressthisissueandtoharmonizeearlydialoguesbetweenHTAagenciesandtheproducersofhealthtechnolo-gies,recently,therehasbeenlaunchedanewinitiativeinEuropecalled"ShapingEuropeanEarlyDialogue"(SEED)[14].
Thispilotconsortium,ledbytheFrenchHauteAutoritédeSanté(HAS)andfinancedbytheEuropeanCommission(EC),iscurrentlycovering10projects(7fortherapeuticsand3formedicaldevices),whichwillfacilitatethedevelopmentofmethodologicalguidelinesontheearlystagepayer–producerinteraction.
Anumberoflegislativeactsincentivizingindustry–payerconvergencehavealsoappearedatanationallevel.
Forexam-ple,intheUK,theHealthandSocialCareActof2012hasintroducedaframeworktoencouragecollaborationbetweentheNationalHealthServiceandlifesciencecompaniesaimedatfacilitatinginnovationandhealthcaredelivery[15].
Theearlydialoguesbetweenmanufacturerandreimburse-mentauthoritiesareparticularlyimportantinlightoftheexistinginconsistenciesintheway"innovation"isdefinedbybothparties.
Itfrequentlyoccursthatproducersconsider"me-too"medicinesasinnovativebecauseoftheirdistinctmanufacturingprocessanddifferencesinthemechanismofactionvis-à-visthestandardofcare.
Onthecontrary,reim-bursementauthoritiespaymoreattentiontotheoverallcom-parativeeffectofatherapeuticversustheassociatedcosts,andlittlearetheyinterestedinthesurrogateendpointsortechno-logicalpeculiaritiesofaninnovativeproduct.
AccordingtoBach(2009),pricesofthemajorityofanti-cancertherapeuticsareescalatingwithgreatervelocitythanthehealthbenefitsassociatedwiththem,makingeachtreat-mentprogresslesscost-effectivethanthepreviousone[16].
Havingnoultimatewaytoassessthetruevalueofinnovation,payersareguidedbyasimpleprinciplethatinnovationwith-outastrongdifferentiationshouldnotbeincludedintheirdrugformularies,whileauniquetherapeuticordiagnosticsolutionwithgreaterrelativeeffectivenesstargetingahighunmetneedismorelikelytoseethereimbursementgreenlight.
Yet,theborderlinebetween"strong"and"weak"differen-tiationvariesgreatlybetweenHTAandreimbursementau-thorities,makingitliterallyimpossibletoadequatelyquantifyinnovation.
Forexample,therecentstudyconductedbyEPMAJournal(2017)8:5–157Droescheletal.
showedthatofthe20identicaloncologytherapiesevaluatedbyFrenchandEnglishHTAbodies,17havebeenrecommendedbyHAS,andonly4receivedposi-tivedecisionsbyNICE[17].
AssuggestedbyFig.
1,apartfromearlydialogueswithcompanies,payersrecognizesubstantialvalueinalmostallkindsofresearchinitiativesrelatedtocostmitigation—fromparticipationinreal-worldevidencestudiestoengagementinacomparativeeffectivenessresearch.
Forexample,in2009–2011,MedcoHealthSolutions(acquiredbyExpressScripts)haslaunchedalargehead-to-headstudyofPlavix(clopidogrel)andEffient(prasugrel)stretchingoutover2yearstoidentifythestrataofheartpatients,whowerenotabletometabolizeclopidogrelandrequiredtobeswitchedtoprasugrelbasedontheirgeneticmakeup[18].
Thus,beingabletodirectpatientstolessexpensivegenericversionsofclopidogrel,thepharmacybenefitmanageracquiredmoreconfidencethatithadachievedcomparablecareatasignifi-cantlyreducedcost.
Alongthesamelines,in2011AstraZenecahassignedanagreementwithWellPoint'sHealthCoretoestablisha4-yearevidenceofdevelopmentpartnershipgeneratingreal-worlddataviaprospectiveandretrospectiveobserva-tionalstudiesonthemosteffectiveandeconomicaltreat-mentsinchronicandotherdiseases[19].
Asapartofthisdeal,companiesweretoanalyzeelectronicmedicalre-cords,reviewclaimsinformation,andconductpatientsurveys.
PayerengagementstrategiesPayerconsultationsAdvisoryboardmeetingsPayersurvey/interviewsOnlinediscussionsGroupworkshopsFormalconsultationsIn-personVirtualForumsFeedbackformsRisksharingagreementsOutcomesbasedschemeEvidencebasedschemeFinanciallybasedschemePrice-volumeagreementsRebates/DiscountsUtilizationcapsPay-for-performanceOutcomesguaranteeDiseasemanagementschemesCoveragewithevidencedevelopmentExpertisebasedpartnershipsJointevidencegenerationMedicationadherenceprojectsRealworldevidenceComparativeeffectivenessTelemedicineE-pillsM-healthPatientfinancialincentivesUser-friendlydeliverydevicesBetterhealthcaredeliveryPatient/providereducationRetrospectivedataanalysisMedicalclaimsdataPharmacyclaimsdataLaboratoryclaimsdataFig.
1Examplesofinnovativepayerengagementstrategiesinpersonalizedmedicine8EPMAJournal(2017)8:5–15Anotherattractiveareaforlifesciencecompaniestocol-laboratewithreimbursementauthoritiesispoormedicationadherence,whichisperhapsthehottestissuefacedbypayersthesedaysalongwithcostcontainment.
Hence,byleveraginginnovativepatient-centeredsolutions(e.
g.
,financialincen-tives,telemedicine,e-pills,m-health,user-friendlydrugdeliv-erydevices,andimprovinghealthcaredelivery)companiesareabletowintrustandcreategreatervalueforpayers.
TheMerck–CignacollaborationonJanuviaandJanumetisoneofthesuccessfulindustry–payerpartnershipexamplesresultingin87%improvedpatientadherencetotherapy,inwhichMerckintroducedlargediscountstopatientswhofollowedthemedicationregimeasprescribed,andCignaloweredco-paylevelsforadheringpatients[8].
AnothercaseofWellDoc'sBlueStaralsoperfectlyillustrateshowamobile-integratedtherapycoupledwithelectronichealthrecordsen-ablesadultswithtype2diabetestoachievestatisticallysig-nificantimprovementsinHbA1clevel,enhancepatientsatis-factionandwinreimbursement[20,21].
Establishingrisk-sharingagreements(also,"manageden-tryagreements,""patientaccessschemes,""RSAs,""MEAs,"and"PAS")isanotherbroadlyutilizedapproachtoengagewithpayers,forsucharrangementsofferthepotentialforear-lieraccesstonewtherapeuticsanddiagnosticsbylinkingre-imbursementlevelstoreal-worldperformanceoruseofaproduct.
RSAsaimatsharingfinancialrisksduetouncertaintyrelatedtotheintroductionofnewtechnologies[22].
TherearethreemajorgroupsofRSAs[23]:1)Financiallybasedschemesdefineproducer'scontribu-tionstothecostofatherapeuticordiagnosticbasedonfinancialthresholds,andnotlinkingcoveragetohealthoutcomes(e.
g.
,price–volumeagreements,rebates,dis-counts,andutilizationcaps);2)Outcome-basedschemesareperformance-basedagree-ments,inwhichhealth-relatedqualityoflifepredeter-minespricingandreimbursementlevels(e.
g.
,pay-for-performance,outcomesguarantee,anddiseasemanage-mentschemes);3)Evidence-basedschemes(also,"coveragewithevidencedevelopment"or"CED")areacategoryofindustry–pay-erdeals,inwhichacompanyisgrantedtemporaryreim-bursementinexchangeforgenerationofsupplementaryreal-worldevidencewiththesubsequentrevisionofcov-erageconditionsbasedonthecollectedevidence.
AccordingtoFerrarioandKanavos,Belgium,England,Sweden,andtheNetherlandshad133activeRSAsasof2012,withEnglishpayersgivingpreferencestodiscountsandfreedoses;DutchprioritizingCED;SwedesconsideringCED,monitoringutilizationandcompliancewithrestrictionsviaobservationalstudies;andBelgiansequallyusingalloftheaforementionedpractices[24].
TheutilizationofRSAsisalsogainingmomentumintheAsia-Pacificregionwith98schemesobservedinAustralia,5inNewZealandand3inSouthKorea[23].
Theemergenceofsuchinnovativeap-proachestomarketaccessisanimperativemilestoneinfor-mulatingnewgenerationpayer–produceragreementsbasedonopendialogue,cooperation,andmulti-stakeholdervaluecreation.
Amongotherpremisesfortheindustryandpayerstocol-laborateisthefactthatreimbursementauthoritiesareunder-staffed,budget-constrainedandboggeddownintheirroutine,oftenunderperformingintheareasofdiseasemanagement,dataanalysis,aswellaspatientandprovidereducation[25].
Hence,therearetremendousopportunitiesforthesestake-holderstopartnerfillingtheaforementionedgapsonaccountofadisease-specificexpertiseandresources.
Forinstance,lastyear,NovoNordiskhaslaunchedanini-tiativecalledcitieschangingdiabetes,whereitpartneredwithanumberoflargeprivateinsurers,likeUnitedHealthcare,BlueCrossBlueShield,Aetna,andCigna,totackletheprob-lemofurbandiabetesintheUSA,analyzingkeyfactorsthatdrivetheglobalpandemicandutilizingthatknowledgetoshapereal-worldsolutions[26].
Likewise,in2011,PfizerteamedupwithHumanatobringtogetherdataandscientificinformationtocreateabettercomprehensionofpatientneedsanddrugeffectiveness[27].
Tosumup,therearenumerousopportunitiesforproducersandreimbursementauthoritiestocollaboratebasedontheunmetpayerneeds,includingthenecessitytoreducehealthcarecosts,pooradherence,highuncertaintyandrisksassociatedwithfuturelaunches,andlackofspecificexpertiseandresources.
Successfullifesciencecompaniesthatareabletocustomizetheirstate-of-the-artpayerengagementstrategiestotheseneedsmayachievecloserproximitywithpayersandestablishlonger-termtrust-basedrelationships.
CasestudiesThelast5yearswereabreakoutperiodfordealsbetweenlifesciencecompaniesandreimbursementauthoritiesintheareaofpersonalizedmedicinewithanumberoffelicitouscollabo-rativepracticesestablishedalready,andmanymoreyettoemerge.
Belowareseveralcasestudiesfromboththerapeuticanddiagnosticrealms,consideredasthe"bestpractices"inpayerengagement:"Roche–SwissRe"collaborationinChinaRocheisaglobalhealthcarecompanydevelopinginnovativetherapeuticanddiagnosticproductsintheareaswithunmetmedicalneeds.
Asof2014,threeoutoftenbest-sellingblock-bustermedicinesinoncologyweredevelopedandcommer-cializedbyRoche[28].
EPMAJournal(2017)8:5–159In2010,thecompanylinedupwithSwissRetostrengthenitspresenceintheChinesemarketbyintroducingrisk-sharingdealstolocalinsurers.
SincedirectcommerceofforeignretailinsurancewasprohibitedbylawinChina,RocheandSwissRecameupwitharevolutionaryideatostartsellingreinsur-ance,andthusconvincingChineseinsurerstooffercoverageforhigh-qualitycancertherapeutics.
Asapartofthiscollabo-ration,RocheprovidesSwissReandlocalinsurerswithmar-ketingsupportandstatisticaldataondifferenttypesofcancer,whileSwissReprovidesChineseinsurancecompanieswithreinsuranceandtechnicalsupportontheproductdesignandpricing[29].
Withinjust2years,theRoche–SwissRecollaborationinChinaallowedthelocalinsurancepolicyholders,includingCPICLife,toachievetheirfirstmilestone—sellinginsuranceto6millioncustomers—thusfacilitatingaccessofalargenumberofcancerpatientstoinnovativetreatments,liketrastuzumab[30,31].
"VitrOmics–CZ–CPCT"partnershipintheNetherlandsVitrOmicsHealthcareHoldingisanorganizationspecializedinpersonalizedmedicinefocusingonthedevelopmentofdi-agnosticproductstomeasurekinaseandnuclearreceptorac-tivities,basedonthePamChipplatformcreatedbyitsdaughtercompanyPamGene.
Intheearly2012,thecompanylaunchedaprivate–publiccollaborativeinitiativeengagingwiththeDutchhealthinsur-anceproviderCZandtheCentreforPersonalizedCancerTreatmentwiththegoaltoaddresstheproblemofovertreat-mentinbreastcancer,providingmuchmoreselectivetherapytoastratifiedsubpopulationofpatientsthanstipulatedbytheusualclinicalpractice[32].
Asaresult,thetriadwasawardedavalue-basedhealthcareprizeunderthepatronageofanhonorarychairmanMichaelE.
Porter,establishingabenchmarkfor"goodpractice"inindus-try–payerpartnershipsbasedoncocreationofvalueandtrust.
Thisinitiativehasalsopreparedthegroundfortwosubse-quenttrialsinlungandesophagealcancer.
"EliLilly–Humana"initiativeintheUSAEliLillyisaglobalbiopharmaceuticalcompanywithprimaryfocusonnoncommunicablechronicdiseasesandnearlyacen-turyofexperienceindiabetesresearch.
In2013,thecompanyannouncedjointresearchcollabora-tionwithalargehealthcareinsurancecompany,Humana,inordertoconductaretrospectiveanalysisofmedical,pharma-cy,andlaboratoryclaimsdatawiththeprimaryobjective—toidentifymodifiablecharacteristicsofdiabeticpatientsassoci-atedwithincreasedhealthcarecosts,aswellastostudyther-apeuticinterventionsaffectingpatients'adherenceandout-comes[33].
ThisdatawillenableEliLillydesignmoretargetedthera-peuticinterventionsanddiseasemanagementprogramsinthefuture,andassistHumanainaddressingadherenceandcostissuesindiabetes.
Similarresearchinitiativeswerealsointro-ducedbyPfizer,Merck,AstraZeneca,andothercompanies,tightlycollaboratingwithleadinghealthinsuranceproviders[27].
"MolecularMD–Medco"partnershipintheUSAMolecularMDisamanufacturerofmoleculardiagnostictestsforoncologyapplications,includingaqRT-PCRassaytomea-sureBCR-ABLlevelspriortoinitiationofchronicmyeloidleukemia(CML)therapy.
ThePhiladelphiachromosome(BCR-ABL)isfoundin95%ofCMLpatientsandiscurrentlyconsideredtobetheprimarycauseofthedisease[34,35].
In2011,theUSleadingpharmacybenefitmanagerMedcoHealthSolutionshaslaunchedaprogramtitled"DNADirectbyMedco"incollaborationwithMolecularMDtoidentifypatientseligiblefortreatment,therebyreducingcostsfortreatingpatientsthatarenotresponsive[35].
Thiscollaborativepatient-centeredinitiativeledtoasignif-icantreductioninhealthcarecostsforMedco,increasedmar-ketshareandrevenuesofMolecularMD,improveddecision-makingofphysicians,andenhancedthequalityofcareofpatients.
ApartfromtheCMLprogram,Medcohasalsosignedpartnershipswithotherlifesciencecompaniestoiden-tifypatientseligibleforwarfarin,clopidogrel,tamoxifen,abacavir,andmaraviroc.
"NuoTherapeutics–CMS"risk-sharingdealintheUSANuoTherapeuticsisabiomedicalcompanydevelopingandcommercializingindividualizedregenerativewound-healingtherapies.
Thecompany'sflagshipproductisAurix,anau-tologoushematogelusedtotreatdiabeticfoot,pressure,andvenouslegulcers.
In2010,facinganationalnoncoveragedeterminationonblood-derivedproductsforchronicnonhealingwounds,NuoTherapeuticshasinitiatedadialoguewiththeCentersforMedicare&MedicaidServices(CMS)onhowtoabolishthisnationalmandateforAurix,consideringtherobustsafetyandeffectivenessprofileofitsproduct[36].
In2011,theman-dateforAurixwasremoved,yettheCMSconcludedthatalthoughpromising,theprovideddatawasnotsufficienttovalidatetheproduct'sgeneralizabilitytotheMedicarepopu-lation,hence,additionalreal-worldevidencewouldhavebeenrequiredforAurixtobeincludedinthepositivereimburse-mentlist.
In2014–2015,aftertheapprovalofprotocolsforlaunchingthethreeprospectiverandomizedeffectivenesstri-als,thepositiveCEDdecisionwasgrantedtoNuoTherapeutics[37].
10EPMAJournal(2017)8:5–15GlobalpricingpoliciesCurrently,weobservethedebateonglobalpricingpoliciesinparticulartodevelopessentialmedicinesandensureitsafford-abilityandavailabilityinthelongertermforaconsistentsup-plyindevelopingcountries,likeantiretrovirals,artemisinincombinationtherapies,drug-resistanttuberculosismedicines,liposomalamphotericinB(forvisceralleishmaniasis),andpneumococcalvaccines,andtopromotepoliciesthat"de-link"thefinancingofR&Dfromthepriceofmedicines[38].
Theroleofinternationalalliances,not-for-profitenter-prises,isconstantlyincreasing,e.
g.
,thecontributionofGlobalAllianceforTuberculosisDrugDevelopment(TBAlliance)toapublic–privatepartnership,thatdrawsupontheresourcesofbothprivateandpublicinstitutionstohelpaddressthisurgenthealthneedaimstostopthespreadoftuberculosisbydevelopingnew,faster-acting,andaffordabletuberculosisdrugs[39].
TheGlobalFund[40]workstosup-portprogramsofprevention,treatment,andcareforAIDS,tuberculosis,andmalariaandtostrengthenhealthsystems.
Eligiblecountriescanreceiveanupfrontallocation,whichprovidesimprovedpredictabilityoffunding.
Startingfromthecountry'snationalstrategicplan,stakeholdersparticipateinanongoingandinclusivecountrydialogue.
Theseveralexamplesoftheso-called"philanthrocapitalism"thatincludeprivateinitiatives/effortsofBillandMelindaGates[41]andChanZuckerbergInitiative(CZI)[42]demonstratefairsuccessandmightbecomemoreimportantplayertohelpfightingchallenginginequalitiesinhealthcarefundinginthefuture.
Horizon2020andpersonalizinghealthandcareDuringthefirst4yearsofHorizon2020(workprogramsfor2014/2015and2016/2017),theEUresearchfundingprogramHorizon2020(2014–2020)andinparticulartheCommission'sproposalforhealth,demographicchange,andwellbeingchallenge[43]willinvestmorethan2billionincallsforproposalsoractionsconsideredasaninvestmentinbetterhealthforall,aimstosupportthedevelopmentofnew,safer,andmoreeffectiveinterventionstotestanddemonstratenewmodelsandtoolsforhealthandcaredeliveryandalsocontributestothesustainabilityofhealthandcaresystems[43,44].
GrantingschemesoftheEuropeanCommission,likethelargestpublic–privateinitiativeinnovativemedicinesinitia-tive(IMI)[45]withatotalbudgetof130millionaimingtospeedupthedevelopmentofbetterandsafermedicinesforpatientsaddressestherapyanddiagnosticdevelopmentchal-lengestodevelopnovelsolutionsforunmetmarketneeds.
Thus,relevantHorizon2020callslike"Thedevelopmentofnewmethodsandmeasuresforimprovedeconomicevalu-ationandefficiencymeasuresinthehealthsector"focusoneconomicmodeldevelopment[46];EUfundingforprecommercialprocurement(PCP)andpublicprocurementofinnovativesolutions(PPI)projectsareavailableacrossthedifferent2016–2017Horizon2020workprograms[47]over-comingbarriersinprecompetitivepublicprocurementsofin-novativesolutionsinparticularfromSMEs.
Thiscasestudysignifiestheimportanceofearlydialogueswithpayers.
Yet,italsodemonstratesthatalthoughNuoTherapeuticswasrewardedforitspersistenceandcollabora-tiveapproachtoCMS,muchtimeandfinancialresourcescouldhavebeensaved,shouldthecompanyestablishthedi-aloguewiththereimbursementauthorityearlierinthedevel-opmentalphase.
ConclusionsReimbursementauthorities,substantiallyfreefromregulatoryconstraintsanddrivenbytheescalatinghealthcareexpendi-tures,aregaininggreaterpowertoimpacttheprescriptionbehaviorofphysicians.
Althoughthepayers'attemptstocon-tainhealthcarecostsmayhaveapositiveeconomiceffectfromanationalhealthserviceperspective,itmayalsohaveaneg-ativeclinicalaffectfromanindividualpatientperspective,duetorestrictedcoverageofeffectivepremium-pricedproducts(directimpact),aswellasviaunderincentivizationofinnova-tion(indirectimpact).
Inthepastseveralyears,thelifesciencecompanieshavebeenresponsivetothenewpayerrolebyredesigningsalesandmarketaccessteams,adjustingandlocalizingtheirclinicalandpharmacoeconomicstudiesinaccordancewiththeidenti-fiedpayerrequirements,aswellasconductingmoreresearchonpayerneeds.
Consideringthatthesestrategiesprovidepharmaceuticalanddiagnosticcompanieswithonlyincre-mentalbenefits,producersareadvisedtohavemoreopendialogueswithpayersupfrontandtoestablishtightercollab-orativeinitiativeswithreimbursementauthoritiesbasedontrustandcocreationofvalue.
Therearemanywaysforproducersandpayerstocollabo-ratethroughouttheproductlifecycle—fromdataexchangeandscientificcounselingtoresearchcollaborationaimedatreducinghealthcarecosts,addressingadherenceissues,anddiminishingrisksassociatedwithfuturelaunches.
Successfullifesciencecompaniesthatareabletodesigntheirstate-of-the-artpayerengagementstrategiesaroundpayerneedsmayachievecloserproximitywiththesestakeholdersandestablishlonger-termtrust-basedrelationships.
Gazingintothefuture,scenariosinwhichpayersinvestintothelifesciencecompaniestodevelop"tailor-made"ther-apeuticordiagnosticproductsseemnottobethatfaroff,althoughtheethicalandlegalconcernsassociatedwithsuchpracticesarealsolikelytoemerge.
Moreover,weanticipateagreaternumberofearlydialogueinitiativesbetweenlifesci-encecompaniesandpublicpayers(notonlyprivatepayers)toEPMAJournal(2017)8:5–1511ariseattheregional,nationalandinternationallevels.
Withtheemergenceofpan-Europeanprograms,likeSEED,itisalsoexpectedthatearlydialogueswithpayerswillbecomemoretransparentandsystemized,whichwillleadtopromptermarketaccessofnewtherapeuticanddiagnosticproducts.
Theseandothertopicsaresubjecttoourfuturescientificresearch.
OutlookandexpertrecommendationsCurrentpaperconformwiththePPPMobjectivessummarizedintheEPMAWhitePaper2012[48]tosupportpersonalizedmedicinetobewidelyadoptedinclinicalsettoyieldsafer,moreeffective,andlessexpensivemedicalinterventions[39]andprovidestakeholderswithevidenceofitsclinical,cost-effectiveness,andfinancialviability.
Personalizedmedicineraiseinvestors'interestandexpectationsanddesireswhopro-videtherequiredcapital.
Ultimately,thebigpharmaceuticalindustryhasbeenditheringtoreceiveapersonalizedmedicineapproachasitwasexpectedthatpatientstratificationwouldpromptdrasticallydiminishedmarketsizes[48,49].
However,thereisevidencethatpersonalizedmedicine,basedonbio-markers,maydemonstratesuperioreffectivenessthatwarrantshigherpricing.
Manynewpersonalizedmedicinescanbeex-pectedtobecost-effectivebecauseoftheincreasedclinicaleffect,eveniftheyhavepremiumprices.
Ontheotherhand,inmanycountries,tolinkreimbursementtocost-effectivenessviacleardialoguebetweenthecommercialandscientificgroupsbecomeacommonpracticeensuringa"rightculture"forpromotingtruth-seekingratherthanprogression-seekingbehavior[50]fordifferentiatedandreimbursablemedicine,includingimportantelements,likemarketopportunity,scien-tificunderstandingandunmetmedicalneeds,evaluatingrisk,andprobabilityoftechnicalandregulatorysuccess.
Therecentmassiveresourcesdevotedtogenome-sequencingstudiespar-adoxicallyprovidedverylittlenewevidence.
However,abet-terstrategyforidentifyingnewtreatmentoptionsmaybetodevelopmethodsforanalyzingthesignalingnetworksthatunderliediseasedevelopment,progression,andtherapeutic[51–53].
NationalandinternationalgrantingstrategiesinPPPMareconstantlydiscussedbyEuropeaninitiative,suchasEPMA[54],pilotprogramstosupportprospectivehealthcarehavealreadybeenset.
Sinceitsverybeginning,EPMAissystematicallyworkingontheeconomyofPPPM[4,44,48,52,54–58].
Potentialproblems/limitationsofimplementationpersonal-izedmedicineapproach,whichstillfacesanuncertainfuture,sincebeingaddressingpreventionratherthantargetedtherapy,ismoreexpensivethanexistingsuccessfulpreventiveinter-ventions[59–61].
Personalizedmedicineaffectingthecostsofmedicalcarealtersthefutureoftheentirehealthcaresystemandhassuggestedthatmedicalcarecostswillbereducedinthefuture.
Anotherchallengeforimplementingpersonalizedmedicineinlow-andmiddle-incomecountries(LMICs)[60]isthelackofawarenessofneedsforpersonalizedmedicineamongthegeneralpopulation,loweducationallevel(overallliteracyratesformanyLMICslessthan67%),howeverthisstatementmightbeisstereotyped—e.
g.
,UkraineisformallyLMIC,butdemonstrateratherhigheducationallevelofpopulation.
Wesuggestthefurtherstudiesonthefollowingpoints:&thedevelopmentofnewmethodsandmeasuresforim-provedeconomicevaluationandefficiencymeasuresinthehealthsectortogainadvancesinincreasingvalue,promotehealth-seekingbehaviors;&strategicplanningforreimbursement,theoutputofnewproductsonthemarketandpatientaccesstoinnovationsonallstages—developmentpredictivemarkersforpa-tientsstratification,personalizedtreatments,andpreven-tionandbeyond;&avoidoverusingunnecessaryclinicaldiagnostic,screen-ing,andtherapeuticalinterventionsthatlacksufficientev-idenceonefficacyandsafetyviavalue-guidedapproach;&developmulticriteriamodelsforvaluingmedicines[62];&toorganizerelevantclinicaltrialstosearchtheevidence,comparativeeffectivenessresearch(CER)usingpopula-tion-based,retrospectivedatacaninformassessmentsofpersonalizedmedicine,includingimplementationofN-of-1trials[63];&thedevelopmenteducationalprogramsincompliancewithexpertsinmedicalfieldsconsiderethicalissuestobalanceinvolvementofbigpharmacologycompanies&adaptationofNationalmedicallegislation;politicalsup-portwilllikewisebeexpectedtohelpforaccomplishingnormalrepaymentamongstsuppliersandpayers,sothatforthcomingconsiderationcansatisfyitsguaranteeofbe-ingthecost-effectivemedicalmodeltoimprovenationalhealthsystems;&adherethemedicallegislationindevelopingcountriestomeetrequirementsofnovelandeffectivemodels;&toinvolvesmallcompanieswhichhavehigherR&Dpro-ductivitycomparedwithlargercompanies[64];&todevelopapplicablebusinessmodelsforLMICsforre-ductioninhealthdisparitiesbetweenresource-richcoun-triesandLMICs;&furtherresearchisneededtodevelopthemodelstoboostthereimbursementpolicyforeffectivenonpharmacologicalapproaches,likephysicaltherapy,painmanagement,musculoskeletalultrasound-guidedinterventions[65,66],treatmentsviaprobiotics,personalizeddiets[67],andregenerativemedicine,whichrecentlydemonstratedhighlevelofefficacyandsafety[68];&considerethicalissues,security,andprivacyofmedicalandfinancialinformation[56];12EPMAJournal(2017)8:5–15&implementationofpersonalizedapproachshouldbedonesmoothlyviadevelopmentaccessiblehealthcareandNationalmedicaleconomyandupdatedlegislationforin-clusive,innovativeandreflectivesocieties[69].
AHA,AmericanHeartAssociation;ASCO,AmericanSocietyofClinicalOncology;CE,ConformitéEuropéenne;CED,CoveragewithEvidenceDevelopment;CMS,CentersforMedicare&MedicaidServices;EC,EuropeanCommission;EMA,EuropeanMedicinesAgency;FDA,FoodandDrugAdministration;HAS,HauteAutoritédeSanté;HTA,healthtechnologyassessment;IQWIG,InstituteforQualityandEfficiencyinHealthCare;NHS,NationalHealthService;NICE,NationalInstituteforHealthandCareExcellence;RSA,risk-sharingagreements;SEED,ShapingEuropeanEarlyDialogue;LMIC,low-andmiddle-incomecountries.
AcknowledgementsWeacknowledgetheEPMAJournaleditorialteamandBioMedCentralteamfortheopportunitytopublishthiswork.
Authors'contributionsIAsuggestedtheideaofthestudy,preparedthefirstdraftofmanuscript,didtheliteratureanalysis,andreviewedthecasestudies.
RVBdidtheworkonthesecondmanuscriptdraft,formu-latedfutureoutlooks,andthePPPMconcept.
Bothauthorsreadandapprovedthefinalmanuscript.
CompliancewithethicalstandardsAuthor'sinformationIAisaMarketAccessConsultantatUnicorninZhytomyr,Ukraine.
RVB,M.
D.
,Ph.
D.
isamedicaldoctorintheClinicalHospital"Pheophania"oftheStateAffairsDepartment,researcherintheInterferonDepartmentofZabolotny,InstituteofMicrobiologyandVirology,NationalAcademyofSciencesofUkraine,andnationalrepre-sentativeoftheEuropeanAssociationforPredictive,Preventive,andPersonalizedMedicine(EPMA)inUkraine.
EthicsapprovalandconsenttoparticipateNotapplicableConsentforpublicationNotapplicableAvailabilityofdataandmaterialNotapplicableCompetinginterestsAuthorsdeclarethattheyhavenocompetinginterests.
FundingAuthorsdidnotreceivefundingtopreparecurrentarticle.
OpenAccessThisarticleisdistributedunderthetermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttribution4.
0InternationalLicense(http://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by/4.
0/),whichpermitsunrestricteduse,distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedyougiveappro-priatecredittotheoriginalauthor(s)andthesource,providealinktotheCreativeCommonslicense,andindicateifchangesweremade.
References1.
EdlinM.
Drugmanufacturersseekpayerfeedback.
ManagedHealthcareExecutive.
2013.
http://managedhealthcareexecutive.
modernmedicine.
com/managed-healthcare-executive/news/user-defined-tags/diabetes/drug-manufacturers-seek-payer-feedback.
Accessed1Nov2016.
2.
NationalAuditOffice.
Investigationintothecancerdrugsfund.
NationalAuditOffice:DepartmentofHealthandNHSEngland.
2015.
https://www.
nao.
org.
uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Investigation-into-the-Cancer-Drugs-Fund1.
pdfAccessed1Nov2016.
3.
MillerJ.
Healthsystemsraisethebaronreimbursingnewdrugs.
PharmTechnol.
2014;38:7.
4.
AkhmetovI,BubnovRV.
Assessingvalueofinnovativemoleculardiagnostictestsintheconceptofpredictive,preventive,andper-sonalizedmedicine.
EPMAJ.
2015;6:19.
doi:10.
1186/s13167-015-0041-3.
5.
WilsonA,CohenJ.
PatientaccesstonewcancerdrugsintheUnitedStatesandAustralia.
ValueHealth.
2011;14(6):944–52.
doi:10.
1016/j.
jval.
2011.
05.
004.
6.
SchnipperLE,DavidsonNE,WollinsDS,TyneC,BlayneyDW,BlumD,etal.
AmericanSocietyofClinicalOncologystatement:aconceptualframeworktoassessthevalueofcancertreatmentoptions.
AmSocClinOncol.
2015;33(23):2563–77.
doi:10.
1200/JCO.
2015.
61.
6706.
7.
AndersonJL,HeidenreichPA,BarnettPG,CreagerMA,FonarowGC,GibbonsRJ,etal.
ACC/AHATaskForceonPerformanceMeasures,ACC/AHATaskForceonPracticeGuidelines.
ACC/AHAstatementoncost/valuemethodologyinclinicalpracticeguide-linesandperformancemeasures:areportoftheAmericanCollegeofCardiology/AmericanHeartAssociationTaskForceonPerformanceMeasuresandTaskForceonPracticeGuidelines.
Circulation.
2014;129(22):2329–45.
doi:10.
1161/CIR.
0000000000000042.
8.
SchoonveldE.
Thepriceofglobalhealth:drugpricingstrategiestobalancepatientaccessandthefundingofinnovation.
2nded.
NewYork:Routledge;2015.
9.
NahuisR,BoonWP.
Theimpactofpatientadvocacy:thecaseofinnovativebreastcancerdrugreimbursement.
SociolHealthIlln.
2011;33(1):1–15.
doi:10.
1111/j.
1467-9566.
2010.
01271.
x.
10.
ThomsonReuters&Deloitte.
MeasuringtheReturnfromPharmaceuticalInnovation.
WeatheringtheStormDeloitte.
2013.
http://www2.
deloitte.
com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/life-sciences-health-care/deloitte-uk-manufacturing-measuring-the-return-from-pharmaceutical-innovation-2013.
pdf.
Accessed1Nov2016.
11.
HwangTJ,CarpenterD,KesselheimAS.
Payingforinnovation:reimbursementincentivesforantibiotics.
SciTranslMed.
2015;7(276):276fs9.
doi:10.
1126/scitranslmed.
aaa1429.
12.
KinchMS,PatridgeE,PlummerM,HoyerD.
AnanalysisofFDA-approveddrugsforinfectiousdisease:antibacterialagents.
DrugDiscovToday.
2014;19(9):1283–7.
doi:10.
1016/j.
drudis.
2014.
07.
005.
13.
ExecutiveOfficeofthePresident.
ReporttothePresidentoncom-batingantibioticresistance.
PCAST.
2014.
https://www.
whitehouse.
gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_carb_report_sept2014.
pdf.
Accessed1Nov2016.
14.
HarousseauJ,PavlovicM,MouasH,MeyerF.
ShapingEuropeanearlydialogues:theSEEDproject.
ValueHealth.
2015;18(7):A562.
doi:10.
1016/j.
jval.
2015.
09.
1830.
15.
DawsonM.
Pharma-payerpartnershipsseektoproveeffectivenessofcare.
AmJManagCare.
2014;20(10SpecNo):E6.
16.
BachPB.
LimitsonMedicare'sabilitytocontrolrisingspend-ingoncancerdrugs.
NEnglJMed.
2009;360(6):626–33.
doi:10.
1056/NEJMhpr0807774.
17.
DroeschelD,dePazB,HouzelotD,WalzerS.
AcomparisonofmarketaccessevaluationsfornewoncologytherapiesinFrance,GermanyandtheUK:ananalysisusingthePrismaccessdatabase.
ValueHealth.
2014;17(7):A654.
doi:10.
1016/j.
jval.
2014.
08.
2382.
18.
EpsteinRS,TeagardenJR.
ComparativeeffectivenessresearchandpersonalizedmedicinecatalyzingorcollidingPharmacoEconomics.
2010.
doi:10.
2165/11535830-000000000-00000.
EPMAJournal(2017)8:5–151319.
AstraZeneca.
AstraZenecaandHealthCoreannouncereal-worldevidencedatacollaborationintheUS.
AstraZeneca.
2011.
http://www.
astrazeneca-us.
com/media/press-releases/Article/20110202-astrazeneca-and-healthcore-announce-realworld-evidence.
Accessed1Nov2016.
20.
QuinnCC,CloughSS,MinorJM,LenderD,OkaforMC,Gruber-BaldiniA.
WellDocmobilediabetesmanagementrandomizedcon-trolledtrial:changeinclinicalandbehavioraloutcomesandpatientandphysiciansatisfaction.
DiabetesTechnolTher.
2008;10(3):160–8.
doi:10.
1089/dia.
2008.
0283.
21.
DolanB.
Report:twoinsurerstopay$100monthlyfeeforWellDoc.
MobiHealth.
2012.
http://mobihealthnews.
com/18255/report-two-insurers-to-pay-100-monthly-fee-for-welldoc/.
Accessed1Nov2016.
22.
AkhmetovI,RamaswamyR,AkhmetovI,ThimmarajuPK.
Marketaccessadvancementsandchallengesin"drug-companiondiagnos-tictest"co-developmentinEurope.
JPersMed.
2015;5(2):213–28.
doi:10.
3390/jpm5020213.
23.
LuCY,LuptonC,RakowskyS,BabarZU,Ross-DegnanD,WagnerAK.
PatientaccessschemesinAsia-Pacificmarkets:cur-rentexperienceandfuturepotential.
JPharmPolicyPract.
2015;8(1):6.
doi:10.
1186/s40545-014-0019-x.
24.
FerrarioA,KanavosP.
Dealingwithuncertaintyandhighpricesofnewmedicines:acomparativeanalysisoftheuseofmanagedentryagreementsinBelgium,England,theNetherlandsandSweden.
SocSciMed.
2015;124:39–47.
doi:10.
1016/j.
socscimed.
2014.
11.
003.
25.
StudinI.
Reframingthepharmaceuticalmanufacturer/healthplanrelationshipinmanagedcare.
ManagCare.
2002;11(2):46:49–54.
26.
HoilandJ.
Beyondtheblamegame:howpharmaislearningtocollaborate.
PharmaceuticalExecutive.
2015.
1:1.
http://www.
pharmexec.
com/beyond-blame-game-how-pharma-learning-collaborate.
Accessed1Nov2016.
27.
NashDB.
HardworkingP&Tcommittees.
AmHealthDrugBenefits.
2012;5(6):330.
28.
Statista.
Top10cancerdrugsworldwidebyrevenuein2014(inbillionU.
S.
dollars).
Statista.
2016.
http://www.
statista.
com/statistics/288538/top-cancer-drugs-based-on-revenue/.
Accessed1Nov2016.
29.
LuQ.
SwissResupportsinsurersinChinawithinnovativecancerinsuranceproducts.
SwissRe.
2012.
http://www.
swissre.
com/reinsurance/insurers/life_health/cancer_reins_china_en.
html.
Accessed1Nov2016.
30.
LiH,LiuGG,GlaetzerC.
Financinginnovativemedicinesinmain-landChina:theroleofcommercialhealthinsurance.
ChinStud.
2013;2(3):128–33.
doi:10.
4236/chnstd.
2013.
23020.
31.
IHS.
RochetoboostcancerdrugsalesinChinawithSwissRehealthinsurancepartnership.
2012.
IHSGlobalInsightPerspective.
2012.
https://www.
ihs.
com/country-industry-forecasting.
htmlID=1065973425.
Accessed20Sept2016.
32.
KievitsT.
Personalizedmedicineinclinicalpractice.
InnovationforHealth.
2015.
http://www.
vitromics.
nl/media/69926/presentation-i4h-t.
kievits-vitromics-13021205-for-publication.
pdf.
Accessed1Nov2016.
33.
EliLilly.
HumanaandLillyFormResearchCollaborationtoImproveHealthCareOutcomes.
EliLilly.
2013.
https://investor.
lilly.
com/releasedetail.
cfmReleaseID=787849.
Accessed1Nov2016.
34.
GuoJQ,LianJ,GlassmanA,TalpazM,KantarjianH,DeisserothABetal.
Comparisonofbcr-ablproteinexpressionandPhiladelphiachromosomeanalysesinchronicmyelogenousleuke-miapatients.
AmJClinPathol.
1996.
doi:10.
1186/1471-2407-12-411.
35.
Medco.
MedcopartnerswithMolecularMDonpersonalizedmed-icineprogramforchronicmyeloidleukemia.
ExpressScripts.
2011.
http://www.
medcohealth.
com/.
Accessed1Nov2016.
36.
CMS.
Nationalcoveragedetermination(NCD)forblood-derivedproductsforchronicnon-healingwounds(270.
3).
CMS.
2012.
https://www.
cms.
gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/ncd-details.
aspxNCDId=217&ncdver=5&NCAId=172&NcaName=Non-Autologous+Blood+Derived+Products+for+Chronic+Non-Healing+Wounds&IsPopup=y&bc=AAAAAAAACAAAAA%3D%3D&.
Accessed1Nov2016.
37.
ZacksInvestmentResearch.
NuoTherapeuticsSmallCapResearch.
2015.
http://s1.
q4cdn.
com/460208960/files/May-15-2015_NUOT_Napodano_v001_v296b7.
pdf.
Accessed1Mar2016.
Accessed1Nov2016.
38.
GodmanB,MalmstrmRE,DiogeneE,GrayA,JayathissaS,TimoneyAetal.
ArenewmodelsneededtooptimizetheutilizationofnewmedicinestosustainhealthcaresystemsExpertRevClinPharmacol.
2015;8(1):77–94.
doi:10.
1586/17512433.
2015.
990380.
Review.
39.
GardnerCA,AcharyaT,Pablos-MéndezA.
Theglobalalliancefortuberculosisdrugdevelopment—accomplishmentsandfuturedi-rections.
ClinChestMed.
2005;26(2):341–7.
vii.
Review.
40.
TheGlobalFundhttp://www.
theglobalfund.
org/en/fundingmodel/.
Accessed1Nov2016.
41.
Bill&MelindaGatesFoundationhttp://www.
gatesfoundation.
org/Who-We-Are/General-Information/Leadership/Global-Health.
Accessed1Nov2016.
42.
ChanZuckerbergInitiativehttp://www.
chanzuckerberg.
com.
Accessed20Sept2016.
43.
'Health,DemographicChangeandWellbeing'TheEUFrameworkProgrammeforResearchandInnovationHorizon2020https://ec.
europa.
eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/health-demographic-change-and-wellbeing.
Accessed1Nov2016.
44.
GolubnitschajaO,KinkorovaJ,CostigliolaV.
Predictive,preven-tiveandpersonalisedmedicineasthehardcoreof'Horizon2020':EPMApositionpaper.
EPMAJ.
2014;5(1):6.
doi:10.
1186/1878-5085-5-6.
45.
InnovativeMedicinesInitiative(IMI)http://www.
imi.
europa.
eu/.
Accessed1Nov2016.
46.
Horizon2020callSC1-PM-20-2017:Developmentofnewmethodsandmeasuresforimprovedeconomicevaluationandef-ficiencymeasuresinthehealthsector.
.
http://ec.
europa.
eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/3065-sc1-pm-20-2017.
html.
Accessed1Nov2016.
47.
EUfundingopportunitiesforPCPandPPIhttps://ec.
europa.
eu/digital-single-market/en/news/calls-eu-funding-opportunities-pre-commercial-procurement-and-public-procurement-innovative.
Accessed20Sept2016.
48.
GolubnitschajaO,CostigliolaV,EPMA.
Generalreport&recom-mendationsinpredictive,preventiveandpersonalisedmedicine2012:whitepaperoftheEuropeanAssociationforPredictive,PreventiveandPersonalisedMedicine.
EPMAJ.
2012;3(1):14.
49.
PaulM.
Brownpersonalizedmedicineandcomparativeeffective-nessresearchinaneraoffixedbudgets.
EPMAJ.
2010;1(4):633–40.
doi:10.
1007/s13167-010-0058-6.
50.
CookD,BrownD,AlexanderR,MarchR,MorganP,SatterthwaiteGetal.
LessonslearnedfromthefateofAstraZeneca'sdrugpipe-line:afive-dimensionalframework.
NatRevDrugDiscov.
2014;13(6):419–31.
51.
YaffeMB.
Thescientificdrunkandthelamppost:massivesequenc-ingeffortsincancerdiscoveryandtreatment.
SciSignal.
2013;6(269),e13.
52.
GrechG,ZhanX,YooBC,BubnovR,HaganS,DanesiRetal.
EPMApositionpaperincancer:currentoverviewandfutureper-spectives.
EPMAJ.
2015;6(1):9.
doi:10.
1186/s13167-015-0030-6.
53.
AuswegerC,BurgschwaigerE,KuglerA,SchmidbauerR,SteinekI,TodorovYetal.
Economicconcernsaboutglobalhealthcareinlung,headandneckcancer,meetingtheeconomicchallengeof14EPMAJournal(2017)8:5–15predictive,preventiveandpersonalizedmedicine.
EPMAJ.
2010;1(4):627–31.
doi:10.
1007/s13167-010-0054-x.
54.
National&internationalgrantingstrategiesinPPPM:innovativeprogrammes&economyofpersonalisedmedicine.
EPMAJ.
2011;2(Suppl1):91–93.
doi:10.
1007/s13167-011-0117-7.
55.
AbrahamJ-A,GolubnitschajaO,AkhmetovI,AndrewsRJ,QuintanaL,etal.
EPMA-WorldCongress2015.
EPMAJ.
2016;7Suppl1:9.
doi:10.
1186/s13167-016-0054-656.
GolubnitschajaO,BabanB,BonioloG,WangW,BubnovR,KapallaMetal.
.
Medicineintheearlytwenty-firstcentury:para-digmandanticipation—EPMApositionpaper2016.
EPMAJ.
2016;7:23.
doi:10.
1186/s13167-016-0072-4.
57.
GolubnitschajaO,CostigliolaV,EPMA.
EPMAsummit2014un-dertheauspicesofthepresidencyofItalyintheEU:professionalstatements.
EPMAJ.
2014;6(1):4.
58.
AkhmetovI.
Integratedmarketaccessapproachamplifyingvalueof"Rx-CDx".
EPMAJ.
2016;7Suppl1:A2.
59.
JoynerMJ,PanethN.
Sevenquestionsforpersonalizedmedicine.
JAMA.
2015;314(10):999–1000.
doi:10.
1001/jama.
2015.
7725.
60.
RehmanA,AwaisM,BalochNU.
Precisionmedicineandlow-tomiddle-incomecountries.
JAMAOncol.
2016;2(3):293–4.
doi:10.
1001/jamaoncol.
2015.
5511.
61.
HaydenEC.
Technology:the$1,000genome.
Nature.
2014;507:294–5.
62.
HogerzeilHV,LibermanJ,WirtzVJ,KishoreSP,SelvarajS,Kiddell-MonroeRetal.
Promotionofaccesstoessentialmedicinesfornon-communicablediseases:practicalimplicationsoftheUNpoliticaldeclaration.
Lancet.
2013;381(9867):680–9.
doi:10.
1016/S0140-6736(12)62128-X.
63.
KravitzRL,DuanN,eds,andtheDEcIDEMethodsCenterN-of-1GuidancePanel(DuanN,EslickI,GablerNB,KaplanHC,KravitzRL,LarsonEB,PaceWD,SchmidCH,SimI,VohraS).
DesignandimplementationofN-of-1trials:auser'sguide.
AHRQPublicationNo.
13(14)-EHC122-EF.
Rockville,MD:AgencyforHealthcareResearchandQuality;January2014.
http://www.
effectivehealthcare.
ahrq.
gov/N-1-Trials.
cfm.
Accessed1Nov2016.
64.
RingelM,TollmanP,HerschG,SchulzeU.
DoessizematterinR&DproductivityIfnot,whatdoesNatRevDrugDiscov.
2013;12(12):901–2.
doi:10.
1038/nrd4164.
65.
BubnovRV.
Evidence-basedpainmanagement:istheconceptofintegrativemedicineapplicableEPMAJ.
2012;3(1):13.
66.
TriggerPointInjections—AmeriHealthMedicalPolicieshttp://medpolicy.
amerihealth.
com/policies/mpi.
nsf/2273edcce2a49a6285257bad00552d86/85256aa800623d7a85257d74006d70b2!
OpenDocument.
Accessed1Nov2016.
67.
BubnovRV,SpivakMY,LazarenkoLM,BombaA,BoykoNV.
Probioticsandimmunity:provisionalroleforpersonalizeddietsanddiseaseprevention.
EPMAJ.
2015;6:14.
68.
CentenoCJ,Al-SayeghH,FreemanMD,SmithJ,CentenoCJ,Al-SayeghHetal.
Amulti-centeranalysisofadverseeventsamongtwothousand,threehundredandseventytwoadultpatientsunder-goingadultautologousstemcelltherapyfororthopaediccondi-tions.
IntOrthop.
2016;40:1755–65.
doi:10.
1007/s00264-016-3162-y.
69.
Europeinachangingworld—inclusive,innovativeandreflectiveSocietieshttp://ec.
europa.
eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-societies_en.
pdf.
Accessed1Nov2016.
EPMAJournal(2017)8:5–1515

舍利云:海外云服务器,6核16G超大带宽vps;支持全球范围,原价516,折后价200元/月!

舍利云怎么样?舍利云推出了6核16G超大带宽316G高性能SSD和CPU,支持全球范围,原价516,折后价200元一月。原价80美元,现价30美元,支持地区:日本,新加坡,荷兰,法国,英国,澳大利亚,加拿大,韩国,美国纽约,美国硅谷,美国洛杉矶,美国亚特兰大,美国迈阿密州,美国西雅图,美国芝加哥,美国达拉斯。舍利云是vps云服务器的销售商家,其产品主要的特色是适合seo和建站,性价比方面非常不错,...

LiCloud:香港CMI/香港CN2+BGP服务器,30Mbps,$39.99/月;香港KVM VPS仅$6.99/月

licloud怎么样?licloud目前提供香港cmi服务器及香港CN2+BGP服务器/E3-1230v2/16GB内存/240GB SSD硬盘/不限流量/30Mbps带宽,$39.99/月。licloud 成立於2021年,是香港LiCloud Limited(CR No.3013909)旗下的品牌,主要提供香港kvm vps,分为精简网络和高级网络A、高级网络B,现在精简网络和高级网络A。现在...

华纳云不限流量¥324/年,香港双向CN2(GIA)云服务器/1核1G/50G存储/2Mbps

华纳云(HNCloud Limited)是一家专业的全球数据中心基础服务提供商,总部在香港,隶属于香港联合通讯国际有限公司,拥有香港政府颁发的商业登记证明,保证用户的安全性和合规性。 华纳云是APNIC 和 ARIN 会员单位。主要提供香港和美国机房的VPS云服务器和独立服务器。商家支持支付宝、网银、Paypal付款。华纳云主要面向国内用户群,所以线路质量还是不错的,客户使用体验总体反响还是比较好...

www.kanav001.com为你推荐
51sese.com谁有免费看电影的网站?www.55125.cnwww95599cn余额查询www.765.com有没好的学习网站www.ijinshan.com金山毒霸的网站是多少baqizi.cc和空姐一起的日子电视剧在线观看 和空姐一起的日子全集在线观看59ddd.comarmada m300什么装系统www.jsjtxx.com怎样让电脑安全又高速www.stockstar.com股票分析软件哪个好用?用过的介绍一些莱姿蔓不蔓不枝的蔓是什么意思云鹏清1840年-1901年西方强逼中国签订了哪些不平等合约
花生壳域名 域名注册信息查询 二级域名申请 电信测速器 ddos 免费主机 美国仿牌空间 华为云主机 美国php空间 骨干网络 福建天翼加速 已备案删除域名 789电视 老左来了 东莞数据中心 息壤代理 购买国外空间 申请免费空间和域名 新加坡空间 群英网络 更多