PerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com1ThefollowingtestsweredesignedtocomparetheperformanceofBackupAssist'sZipEnginewithotherpopularZIPcompressionapplications:WinZIPandWinRAR.
Testswererunagainstthesamesetofdatatodeterminetheencryptionspeed,transferspeedandcompressionlevelofthedifferentZIPtechnologiesexamined.
HardwareusedWindowsServer2008withIntelQ9550(Quadcore2.
83GHz)processor,8.
00GBRAManddualSATAdrives.
SoftwareusedBackupAssistv6.
0.
0–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
backupassist.
com/BackupAssist/download.
phpBackupswerecreatedusingtheBackupAssistZipEngine.
WinZIPv14.
5–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
winzip.
com/downwz.
htmWinRARv3.
93–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
rarlab.
com/download.
htmFilesetused2,207filestotaling1.
92GB:2,199fileswerelessthan100MBinsize5fileswerebetween100MBand200MBinsize.
2fileswerebetween200MBand1GBinsize.
FileswerebackedupfromonelocallyinstalledSATAdrivetoanotherSATAdriveonthesamemachine:TestresultsForthefollowingtests,2,207fileswereselectedfromalivecompanynetworkshareandcompressedusingthreedifferentZIPapplicationstoa.
ZIParchive.
Filesincludedtypicalofficedocuments,suchasMSWord,ExcelspreadsheetsandPowerPointpresentations,aswellasimages,PDFfiles,andlargerfileslike.
ISOimages.
Selectedsize(GB).
ZIParchivesize(GB)CompressionlevelCompressionratioTimetaken(h:mm:ss)Speed(GB/hr)BackupAssistv61.
921.
70Medium1.
13:10:00:34179WinZIP1.
921.
68Medium1.
14:10:01:4756WinRAR1.
921.
62Medium1.
19:10:06:1915IntheabovetablewecanseethatthecompressionratioachievedwasverysimilaracrossallZIPapplicationstested,butthatthetimetakentocompletethebackupvaried,withBackupAssistbeingconsiderablyfasterwhencompressingthesamesetofdata.
ZipTechnology(BackupAssistZip/WinZIP/WinRAR)SourcedrivedriveBackupdrivePerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com2EncryptiontimeThefollowinggraphshowshowpasswordencryptingthe.
ZIParchiveusingAES256-bitencryptioneffectsthetimetakentocompleteabackup.
Compressionwassetto0fortheseteststodeterminetheeffectofjustencryptiononbackuptimes.
TestingshowsthatencryptionhasarelativelyminimalimpactonbackuptimesforWinRARandBackupAssist(20%and40%respectively),butcausesa93%increaseincompressiontimeforWinZIP,increasingfrom47secondsto91seconds.
Throughput(GB/h)vs.
CompressionlevelThefollowinggraphshowshowthelevelofcompressioneffectsthespeedofthebackup.
ThesamesetofdatawascompressedusingNoCompression,MediumCompressionandHighCompressionsettings.
TestingshowsthatBackupAssist,whichincludeshighperformancemultithreadingarchitecture,outperformsbothWinZIPandWinRARwhencompressionisenabledbyupto164GB/houratMediumCompressionlevelsand109GB/houratHighCompressionlevels.
WhilethecompressedarchivescreatedbyWinZIPandWinRARweresmallerinsizethanthosecreatedbyBackupAssist,thedifferenceinsizewasminimal(seethefollowinggraph)anddidnotaccountfortheadditionaltimetakentocompletethebackup.
0:000:140:280:430:571:121:261:40Compressiontimewith256AESencryption,inminutes:secondsEncryptionenabledEncryptiondisabledBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRAR050100150200250300350400NoCompressionMediumCompressionHighCompressionThroughput(GB/h)CompressionlevelusedBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRARPerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com3Archivesize(GB)vs.
CompressionratioThefollowinggraphshowshowthelevelofcompressionappliedeffectsthesizeofthebackup.
ThesamesetofdatawascompressedusingNoCompression,MediumCompression(50%)andHighCompression(100%)settings.
TestingshowsthatWinRARoutperformsbothWinZIPandBackupAssistintermsofcreatingsmallercompressed.
ZIParchives.
However,whileBackupAssistarchiveswereapproximately6%largerthanthosecreatedusingWinRAR,backuptimesinBackupAssistwereupto11timesfaster,asshowinthegraphonpage2.
Summary/conclusionBackuptimeswithencryptionenabled:1.
WinRAR:20%increase,from21secondsto25seconds2.
BackupAssist:40%increase,from20secondsto28seconds3.
WinZip:93%increase,from47secondsto91seconds.
Throughput(GB/hour)withMediumCompression:1.
BackupAssist:180GB/hour2.
WinZip:56GB/hour3.
WinRAR:15GB/hourArchivesizewithMediumCompression::1.
WinRAR:1.
62GBarchive(1.
19:1compressionratio)2.
WinZip:1.
67GBarchive(1.
14:1compressionratio)3.
BackupAssist:1.
7GBarchive(1.
13:1compressionratio)Wecanseefromthesetestresultsthatintermsofspeed,BackupAssist'sZipEngine,whichbenefitsfrommultithreadingarchitecture,faroutperformsbothWinZipandWinRARbyuptoafactorof12whilestillofferinghighlycomparablecompressionratios,makingitaperfectsolutionforeventhemostdemandingbusinessbackups.
Andwithsupportfortapebackups,theBackupAssistZIPEngineissuitableforanyorganization:fromthesmallestbusinesswantingabasicsolution,tolargeenterprisesneedinglongtermdataarchivaltotape.
FormoredetailsonBackupAssist'sZipEnginevisitourZipproducttourpage,whichcontainsfurtherlinkstowhitepapers,brochuresandfactsheets:http://www.
backupassist.
com/BackupAssist/tour_Zip.
html1.
451.
51.
551.
61.
651.
71.
751.
81.
851.
91.
95NoCompressionMediumCompressionHighCompressionArchivesiez(GB)CompressionlevelusedBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRAR
最近主机参考拿到了一台恒创科技的美国VPS云服务器测试机器,那具体恒创科技美国云服务器性能到底怎么样呢?主机参考进行了一番VPS测评,大家可以参考一下,总体来说还是非常不错的,是值得购买的。非常适用于稳定建站业务需求。恒创科技服务器怎么样?恒创科技服务器好不好?henghost怎么样?henghost值不值得购买?SonderCloud服务器好不好?恒创科技henghost值不值得购买?恒创科技是...
舍利云怎么样?舍利云推出了6核16G超大带宽316G高性能SSD和CPU,支持全球范围,原价516,折后价200元一月。原价80美元,现价30美元,支持地区:日本,新加坡,荷兰,法国,英国,澳大利亚,加拿大,韩国,美国纽约,美国硅谷,美国洛杉矶,美国亚特兰大,美国迈阿密州,美国西雅图,美国芝加哥,美国达拉斯。舍利云是vps云服务器的销售商家,其产品主要的特色是适合seo和建站,性价比方面非常不错,...
韩国服务器怎么样?韩国云服务器租用推荐?韩国服务器距离中国近,有天然的地域优势,韩国服务器速度快而且非常稳定!有不少有亚洲市场的外贸公司选择韩国服务器开拓业务,韩国服务器因自身的优势也受到不少用户的青睐。目前的IDC市场上,韩国、香港、美国三个地方的服务器几乎占据了海外服务器的百分之九十以上。韩国服务器相比美国服务器来说速度更快,而相比香港机房来说则带宽更充足,占用市场份额非常大。那么,韩国服务器...
winrar5.0为你推荐
Symbolbasiertefastreport2画风不同神情相同的各种我的"点绛唇"内存nod32输入ipad支持ipad重庆网通中国联通重庆分公司的公司简介win7关闭445端口win7系统怎么关闭445和135这两个端口google中国地图谷歌中国地图用的是什么投影,什么坐标系win7勒索病毒补丁我的电脑是windows7系统,为什么打不了针对勒索病毒的补丁(杀毒软件显
php网站空间 windows虚拟主机 西安服务器租用 vps优惠码cnyvps 阿里云搜索 t牌 表单样式 evssl证书 服务器怎么绑定域名 国外网站代理服务器 40g硬盘 腾讯云分析 seednet 免费全能主机 亚马逊香港官网 东莞服务器 域名与空间 空间登入 国外的代理服务器 主机返佣 更多