PerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com1ThefollowingtestsweredesignedtocomparetheperformanceofBackupAssist'sZipEnginewithotherpopularZIPcompressionapplications:WinZIPandWinRAR.
Testswererunagainstthesamesetofdatatodeterminetheencryptionspeed,transferspeedandcompressionlevelofthedifferentZIPtechnologiesexamined.
HardwareusedWindowsServer2008withIntelQ9550(Quadcore2.
83GHz)processor,8.
00GBRAManddualSATAdrives.
SoftwareusedBackupAssistv6.
0.
0–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
backupassist.
com/BackupAssist/download.
phpBackupswerecreatedusingtheBackupAssistZipEngine.
WinZIPv14.
5–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
winzip.
com/downwz.
htmWinRARv3.
93–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
rarlab.
com/download.
htmFilesetused2,207filestotaling1.
92GB:2,199fileswerelessthan100MBinsize5fileswerebetween100MBand200MBinsize.
2fileswerebetween200MBand1GBinsize.
FileswerebackedupfromonelocallyinstalledSATAdrivetoanotherSATAdriveonthesamemachine:TestresultsForthefollowingtests,2,207fileswereselectedfromalivecompanynetworkshareandcompressedusingthreedifferentZIPapplicationstoa.
ZIParchive.
Filesincludedtypicalofficedocuments,suchasMSWord,ExcelspreadsheetsandPowerPointpresentations,aswellasimages,PDFfiles,andlargerfileslike.
ISOimages.
Selectedsize(GB).
ZIParchivesize(GB)CompressionlevelCompressionratioTimetaken(h:mm:ss)Speed(GB/hr)BackupAssistv61.
921.
70Medium1.
13:10:00:34179WinZIP1.
921.
68Medium1.
14:10:01:4756WinRAR1.
921.
62Medium1.
19:10:06:1915IntheabovetablewecanseethatthecompressionratioachievedwasverysimilaracrossallZIPapplicationstested,butthatthetimetakentocompletethebackupvaried,withBackupAssistbeingconsiderablyfasterwhencompressingthesamesetofdata.
ZipTechnology(BackupAssistZip/WinZIP/WinRAR)SourcedrivedriveBackupdrivePerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com2EncryptiontimeThefollowinggraphshowshowpasswordencryptingthe.
ZIParchiveusingAES256-bitencryptioneffectsthetimetakentocompleteabackup.
Compressionwassetto0fortheseteststodeterminetheeffectofjustencryptiononbackuptimes.
TestingshowsthatencryptionhasarelativelyminimalimpactonbackuptimesforWinRARandBackupAssist(20%and40%respectively),butcausesa93%increaseincompressiontimeforWinZIP,increasingfrom47secondsto91seconds.
Throughput(GB/h)vs.
CompressionlevelThefollowinggraphshowshowthelevelofcompressioneffectsthespeedofthebackup.
ThesamesetofdatawascompressedusingNoCompression,MediumCompressionandHighCompressionsettings.
TestingshowsthatBackupAssist,whichincludeshighperformancemultithreadingarchitecture,outperformsbothWinZIPandWinRARwhencompressionisenabledbyupto164GB/houratMediumCompressionlevelsand109GB/houratHighCompressionlevels.
WhilethecompressedarchivescreatedbyWinZIPandWinRARweresmallerinsizethanthosecreatedbyBackupAssist,thedifferenceinsizewasminimal(seethefollowinggraph)anddidnotaccountfortheadditionaltimetakentocompletethebackup.
0:000:140:280:430:571:121:261:40Compressiontimewith256AESencryption,inminutes:secondsEncryptionenabledEncryptiondisabledBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRAR050100150200250300350400NoCompressionMediumCompressionHighCompressionThroughput(GB/h)CompressionlevelusedBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRARPerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com3Archivesize(GB)vs.
CompressionratioThefollowinggraphshowshowthelevelofcompressionappliedeffectsthesizeofthebackup.
ThesamesetofdatawascompressedusingNoCompression,MediumCompression(50%)andHighCompression(100%)settings.
TestingshowsthatWinRARoutperformsbothWinZIPandBackupAssistintermsofcreatingsmallercompressed.
ZIParchives.
However,whileBackupAssistarchiveswereapproximately6%largerthanthosecreatedusingWinRAR,backuptimesinBackupAssistwereupto11timesfaster,asshowinthegraphonpage2.
Summary/conclusionBackuptimeswithencryptionenabled:1.
WinRAR:20%increase,from21secondsto25seconds2.
BackupAssist:40%increase,from20secondsto28seconds3.
WinZip:93%increase,from47secondsto91seconds.
Throughput(GB/hour)withMediumCompression:1.
BackupAssist:180GB/hour2.
WinZip:56GB/hour3.
WinRAR:15GB/hourArchivesizewithMediumCompression::1.
WinRAR:1.
62GBarchive(1.
19:1compressionratio)2.
WinZip:1.
67GBarchive(1.
14:1compressionratio)3.
BackupAssist:1.
7GBarchive(1.
13:1compressionratio)Wecanseefromthesetestresultsthatintermsofspeed,BackupAssist'sZipEngine,whichbenefitsfrommultithreadingarchitecture,faroutperformsbothWinZipandWinRARbyuptoafactorof12whilestillofferinghighlycomparablecompressionratios,makingitaperfectsolutionforeventhemostdemandingbusinessbackups.
Andwithsupportfortapebackups,theBackupAssistZIPEngineissuitableforanyorganization:fromthesmallestbusinesswantingabasicsolution,tolargeenterprisesneedinglongtermdataarchivaltotape.
FormoredetailsonBackupAssist'sZipEnginevisitourZipproducttourpage,whichcontainsfurtherlinkstowhitepapers,brochuresandfactsheets:http://www.
backupassist.
com/BackupAssist/tour_Zip.
html1.
451.
51.
551.
61.
651.
71.
751.
81.
851.
91.
95NoCompressionMediumCompressionHighCompressionArchivesiez(GB)CompressionlevelusedBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRAR
小白云是一家国人自营的企业IDC,主营国内外VPS,致力于让每一个用户都能轻松、快速、经济地享受高端的服务,成立于2019年,拥有国内大带宽高防御的特点,专注于DDoS/CC等攻击的防护;海外线路精选纯CN2线路,以确保用户体验的首选线路,商家线上多名客服一对一解决处理用户的问题,提供7*24无人全自动化服务。商家承诺绝不超开,以用户体验为中心为用提供服务,一直坚持主打以产品质量用户体验性以及高效...
80vps怎么样?80vps最近新上了香港服务器、美国cn2服务器,以及香港/日本/韩国/美国多ip站群服务器。80vps之前推荐的都是VPS主机内容,其实80VPS也有独立服务器业务,分布在中国香港、欧美、韩国、日本、美国等地区,可选CN2或直连优化线路。如80VPS香港独立服务器最低月付420元,美国CN2 GIA独服月付650元起,中国香港、日本、韩国、美国洛杉矶多IP站群服务器750元/月...
LightNode是一家成立于2002年,总部位于香港的VPS服务商。提供基于KVM虚拟化技术.支持CentOS、Ubuntu或者Windows等操作系统。公司名:厦门靠谱云股份有限公司官方网站:https://www.lightnode.com拥有高质量香港CN2 GIA与东南亚节点(河内、曼谷、迪拜等)。最低月付7.71美金,按时付费,可随时取消。灵活满足开发建站、游戏应用、外贸电商等需求。首...
winrar5.0为你推荐
SicherheitsserverhostschromepreloadedbaiduAnthemmy支持ipad支持ipaddominavimasios7支付apple支持ipad勒索病毒win7补丁求问win7 64位旗舰版怎么预防勒索病毒itunes备份怎么使用iTunes备份
vps教程 淘宝抢红包攻略 qq云存储 云网数据 美国主机推荐 sub-process 512au 线路工具 国内php空间 丹弗 免费网站申请 200g硬盘 稳定免费空间 789电视剧 超级服务器 vul ledlamp 镇江高防 聚惠网 htaccess 更多