PerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com1ThefollowingtestsweredesignedtocomparetheperformanceofBackupAssist'sZipEnginewithotherpopularZIPcompressionapplications:WinZIPandWinRAR.
Testswererunagainstthesamesetofdatatodeterminetheencryptionspeed,transferspeedandcompressionlevelofthedifferentZIPtechnologiesexamined.
HardwareusedWindowsServer2008withIntelQ9550(Quadcore2.
83GHz)processor,8.
00GBRAManddualSATAdrives.
SoftwareusedBackupAssistv6.
0.
0–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
backupassist.
com/BackupAssist/download.
phpBackupswerecreatedusingtheBackupAssistZipEngine.
WinZIPv14.
5–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
winzip.
com/downwz.
htmWinRARv3.
93–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
rarlab.
com/download.
htmFilesetused2,207filestotaling1.
92GB:2,199fileswerelessthan100MBinsize5fileswerebetween100MBand200MBinsize.
2fileswerebetween200MBand1GBinsize.
FileswerebackedupfromonelocallyinstalledSATAdrivetoanotherSATAdriveonthesamemachine:TestresultsForthefollowingtests,2,207fileswereselectedfromalivecompanynetworkshareandcompressedusingthreedifferentZIPapplicationstoa.
ZIParchive.
Filesincludedtypicalofficedocuments,suchasMSWord,ExcelspreadsheetsandPowerPointpresentations,aswellasimages,PDFfiles,andlargerfileslike.
ISOimages.
Selectedsize(GB).
ZIParchivesize(GB)CompressionlevelCompressionratioTimetaken(h:mm:ss)Speed(GB/hr)BackupAssistv61.
921.
70Medium1.
13:10:00:34179WinZIP1.
921.
68Medium1.
14:10:01:4756WinRAR1.
921.
62Medium1.
19:10:06:1915IntheabovetablewecanseethatthecompressionratioachievedwasverysimilaracrossallZIPapplicationstested,butthatthetimetakentocompletethebackupvaried,withBackupAssistbeingconsiderablyfasterwhencompressingthesamesetofdata.
ZipTechnology(BackupAssistZip/WinZIP/WinRAR)SourcedrivedriveBackupdrivePerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com2EncryptiontimeThefollowinggraphshowshowpasswordencryptingthe.
ZIParchiveusingAES256-bitencryptioneffectsthetimetakentocompleteabackup.
Compressionwassetto0fortheseteststodeterminetheeffectofjustencryptiononbackuptimes.
TestingshowsthatencryptionhasarelativelyminimalimpactonbackuptimesforWinRARandBackupAssist(20%and40%respectively),butcausesa93%increaseincompressiontimeforWinZIP,increasingfrom47secondsto91seconds.
Throughput(GB/h)vs.
CompressionlevelThefollowinggraphshowshowthelevelofcompressioneffectsthespeedofthebackup.
ThesamesetofdatawascompressedusingNoCompression,MediumCompressionandHighCompressionsettings.
TestingshowsthatBackupAssist,whichincludeshighperformancemultithreadingarchitecture,outperformsbothWinZIPandWinRARwhencompressionisenabledbyupto164GB/houratMediumCompressionlevelsand109GB/houratHighCompressionlevels.
WhilethecompressedarchivescreatedbyWinZIPandWinRARweresmallerinsizethanthosecreatedbyBackupAssist,thedifferenceinsizewasminimal(seethefollowinggraph)anddidnotaccountfortheadditionaltimetakentocompletethebackup.
0:000:140:280:430:571:121:261:40Compressiontimewith256AESencryption,inminutes:secondsEncryptionenabledEncryptiondisabledBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRAR050100150200250300350400NoCompressionMediumCompressionHighCompressionThroughput(GB/h)CompressionlevelusedBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRARPerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com3Archivesize(GB)vs.
CompressionratioThefollowinggraphshowshowthelevelofcompressionappliedeffectsthesizeofthebackup.
ThesamesetofdatawascompressedusingNoCompression,MediumCompression(50%)andHighCompression(100%)settings.
TestingshowsthatWinRARoutperformsbothWinZIPandBackupAssistintermsofcreatingsmallercompressed.
ZIParchives.
However,whileBackupAssistarchiveswereapproximately6%largerthanthosecreatedusingWinRAR,backuptimesinBackupAssistwereupto11timesfaster,asshowinthegraphonpage2.
Summary/conclusionBackuptimeswithencryptionenabled:1.
WinRAR:20%increase,from21secondsto25seconds2.
BackupAssist:40%increase,from20secondsto28seconds3.
WinZip:93%increase,from47secondsto91seconds.
Throughput(GB/hour)withMediumCompression:1.
BackupAssist:180GB/hour2.
WinZip:56GB/hour3.
WinRAR:15GB/hourArchivesizewithMediumCompression::1.
WinRAR:1.
62GBarchive(1.
19:1compressionratio)2.
WinZip:1.
67GBarchive(1.
14:1compressionratio)3.
BackupAssist:1.
7GBarchive(1.
13:1compressionratio)Wecanseefromthesetestresultsthatintermsofspeed,BackupAssist'sZipEngine,whichbenefitsfrommultithreadingarchitecture,faroutperformsbothWinZipandWinRARbyuptoafactorof12whilestillofferinghighlycomparablecompressionratios,makingitaperfectsolutionforeventhemostdemandingbusinessbackups.
Andwithsupportfortapebackups,theBackupAssistZIPEngineissuitableforanyorganization:fromthesmallestbusinesswantingabasicsolution,tolargeenterprisesneedinglongtermdataarchivaltotape.
FormoredetailsonBackupAssist'sZipEnginevisitourZipproducttourpage,whichcontainsfurtherlinkstowhitepapers,brochuresandfactsheets:http://www.
backupassist.
com/BackupAssist/tour_Zip.
html1.
451.
51.
551.
61.
651.
71.
751.
81.
851.
91.
95NoCompressionMediumCompressionHighCompressionArchivesiez(GB)CompressionlevelusedBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRAR
ucloud云服务器怎么样?ucloud为了扩大云服务器市场份额,给出了超低价云服务器的促销活动,活动仍然是此前的Ucloud全球大促活动页面。目前,ucloud国内云服务器2元/月起;香港云服务器4元/首月;台湾云服务器3元/首月。相当于2-4元就可以试用国内、中国香港、中国台湾这三个地域的云服务器1个月了。ucloud全球大促仅限新用户,国内云服务器个人用户低至56元/年起,香港云服务器也仅8...
最近主机参考拿到了一台恒创科技的美国VPS云服务器测试机器,那具体恒创科技美国云服务器性能到底怎么样呢?主机参考进行了一番VPS测评,大家可以参考一下,总体来说还是非常不错的,是值得购买的。非常适用于稳定建站业务需求。恒创科技服务器怎么样?恒创科技服务器好不好?henghost怎么样?henghost值不值得购买?SonderCloud服务器好不好?恒创科技henghost值不值得购买?恒创科技是...
CloudCone是一家成立于2017年的国外VPS主机商,提供独立服务器租用和VPS主机,其中VPS基于KVM架构,多个不同系列,譬如常规VPS、大硬盘VPS等等,数据中心在洛杉矶MC机房。商家2021年Flash Sale活动继续,最低每月1.99美元,支持7天退款到账户,支持使用PayPal或者支付宝付款,先充值后下单的方式。下面列出几款VPS主机配置信息。CPU:1core内存:768MB...
winrar5.0为你推荐
L1苹果5动设备管理解决伺服器win7支持ipad支持ipad支持ipad重庆宽带测速重庆云阳电信宽带测速网址谁知道,帮个忙?iexplore.exe应用程序错误iexplore.exe---应用程序错误.是什么意思?phpechophp echo函数 是什么意思fusionchartsfusioncharts怎么生成图片至excel
org域名 域名停靠一青草视频 万网免费域名 hostmonster 美国主机论坛 光棍节日志 css样式大全 java虚拟主机 cpanel空间 空间出租 200g硬盘 秒杀汇 免费测手机号 吉林铁通 个人免费主页 网页提速 太原联通测速 韩国代理ip 工信部网站备案查询 atom处理器 更多