PerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com1ThefollowingtestsweredesignedtocomparetheperformanceofBackupAssist'sZipEnginewithotherpopularZIPcompressionapplications:WinZIPandWinRAR.
Testswererunagainstthesamesetofdatatodeterminetheencryptionspeed,transferspeedandcompressionlevelofthedifferentZIPtechnologiesexamined.
HardwareusedWindowsServer2008withIntelQ9550(Quadcore2.
83GHz)processor,8.
00GBRAManddualSATAdrives.
SoftwareusedBackupAssistv6.
0.
0–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
backupassist.
com/BackupAssist/download.
phpBackupswerecreatedusingtheBackupAssistZipEngine.
WinZIPv14.
5–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
winzip.
com/downwz.
htmWinRARv3.
93–availablefordownloadhere:http://www.
rarlab.
com/download.
htmFilesetused2,207filestotaling1.
92GB:2,199fileswerelessthan100MBinsize5fileswerebetween100MBand200MBinsize.
2fileswerebetween200MBand1GBinsize.
FileswerebackedupfromonelocallyinstalledSATAdrivetoanotherSATAdriveonthesamemachine:TestresultsForthefollowingtests,2,207fileswereselectedfromalivecompanynetworkshareandcompressedusingthreedifferentZIPapplicationstoa.
ZIParchive.
Filesincludedtypicalofficedocuments,suchasMSWord,ExcelspreadsheetsandPowerPointpresentations,aswellasimages,PDFfiles,andlargerfileslike.
ISOimages.
Selectedsize(GB).
ZIParchivesize(GB)CompressionlevelCompressionratioTimetaken(h:mm:ss)Speed(GB/hr)BackupAssistv61.
921.
70Medium1.
13:10:00:34179WinZIP1.
921.
68Medium1.
14:10:01:4756WinRAR1.
921.
62Medium1.
19:10:06:1915IntheabovetablewecanseethatthecompressionratioachievedwasverysimilaracrossallZIPapplicationstested,butthatthetimetakentocompletethebackupvaried,withBackupAssistbeingconsiderablyfasterwhencompressingthesamesetofdata.
ZipTechnology(BackupAssistZip/WinZIP/WinRAR)SourcedrivedriveBackupdrivePerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com2EncryptiontimeThefollowinggraphshowshowpasswordencryptingthe.
ZIParchiveusingAES256-bitencryptioneffectsthetimetakentocompleteabackup.
Compressionwassetto0fortheseteststodeterminetheeffectofjustencryptiononbackuptimes.
TestingshowsthatencryptionhasarelativelyminimalimpactonbackuptimesforWinRARandBackupAssist(20%and40%respectively),butcausesa93%increaseincompressiontimeforWinZIP,increasingfrom47secondsto91seconds.
Throughput(GB/h)vs.
CompressionlevelThefollowinggraphshowshowthelevelofcompressioneffectsthespeedofthebackup.
ThesamesetofdatawascompressedusingNoCompression,MediumCompressionandHighCompressionsettings.
TestingshowsthatBackupAssist,whichincludeshighperformancemultithreadingarchitecture,outperformsbothWinZIPandWinRARwhencompressionisenabledbyupto164GB/houratMediumCompressionlevelsand109GB/houratHighCompressionlevels.
WhilethecompressedarchivescreatedbyWinZIPandWinRARweresmallerinsizethanthosecreatedbyBackupAssist,thedifferenceinsizewasminimal(seethefollowinggraph)anddidnotaccountfortheadditionaltimetakentocompletethebackup.
0:000:140:280:430:571:121:261:40Compressiontimewith256AESencryption,inminutes:secondsEncryptionenabledEncryptiondisabledBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRAR050100150200250300350400NoCompressionMediumCompressionHighCompressionThroughput(GB/h)CompressionlevelusedBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRARPerformanceTest–BackupAssistZIP,WinZIP,andWinRARwww.
BackupAssist.
com3Archivesize(GB)vs.
CompressionratioThefollowinggraphshowshowthelevelofcompressionappliedeffectsthesizeofthebackup.
ThesamesetofdatawascompressedusingNoCompression,MediumCompression(50%)andHighCompression(100%)settings.
TestingshowsthatWinRARoutperformsbothWinZIPandBackupAssistintermsofcreatingsmallercompressed.
ZIParchives.
However,whileBackupAssistarchiveswereapproximately6%largerthanthosecreatedusingWinRAR,backuptimesinBackupAssistwereupto11timesfaster,asshowinthegraphonpage2.
Summary/conclusionBackuptimeswithencryptionenabled:1.
WinRAR:20%increase,from21secondsto25seconds2.
BackupAssist:40%increase,from20secondsto28seconds3.
WinZip:93%increase,from47secondsto91seconds.
Throughput(GB/hour)withMediumCompression:1.
BackupAssist:180GB/hour2.
WinZip:56GB/hour3.
WinRAR:15GB/hourArchivesizewithMediumCompression::1.
WinRAR:1.
62GBarchive(1.
19:1compressionratio)2.
WinZip:1.
67GBarchive(1.
14:1compressionratio)3.
BackupAssist:1.
7GBarchive(1.
13:1compressionratio)Wecanseefromthesetestresultsthatintermsofspeed,BackupAssist'sZipEngine,whichbenefitsfrommultithreadingarchitecture,faroutperformsbothWinZipandWinRARbyuptoafactorof12whilestillofferinghighlycomparablecompressionratios,makingitaperfectsolutionforeventhemostdemandingbusinessbackups.
Andwithsupportfortapebackups,theBackupAssistZIPEngineissuitableforanyorganization:fromthesmallestbusinesswantingabasicsolution,tolargeenterprisesneedinglongtermdataarchivaltotape.
FormoredetailsonBackupAssist'sZipEnginevisitourZipproducttourpage,whichcontainsfurtherlinkstowhitepapers,brochuresandfactsheets:http://www.
backupassist.
com/BackupAssist/tour_Zip.
html1.
451.
51.
551.
61.
651.
71.
751.
81.
851.
91.
95NoCompressionMediumCompressionHighCompressionArchivesiez(GB)CompressionlevelusedBackupAssistv6WinZIPWinRAR
virmach怎么样?virmach家这几年非常火,从商家的黑五闪购开始,以超低的价格吸引了大批的国人客户,而且商家的机器还是非常稳定的,站长手里的4.75刀年付已经用了两年了,非常稳定,不过商家到国内的线路一般,目前商家新上了夏季优惠促销,价格低到发指,年付7.2美元起,商家反馈将在9月开始更换AMD+NVMe平台,这个消息从年初就有了,不过一直没有更换,目前这个时间也不确定是否准确。点击进入:...
pigyun怎么样?PIGYun成立于2019年,2021是PIGYun为用户提供稳定服务的第三年,期待我们携手共进、互利共赢。PIGYun为您提供:香港CN2线路、韩国CN2线路、美西CUVIP-9929线路优质IaaS服务。月付另有通用循环优惠码:PIGYun,获取8折循环优惠(永久有效)。目前,PIGYun提供的香港cn2云服务器仅29元/月起;韩国cn2云服务器仅22元/月起;美国CUVI...
美国服务器哪家平台好?美国服务器无需备案,即开即用,上线快。美国服务器多数带防御,且有时候项目运营的时候,防御能力是用户考虑的重点,特别是网站容易受到攻击的行业。现在有那么多美国一年服务器,哪家的美国云服务器好呢?美国服务器用哪家好?这里推荐易探云,有美国BGP、美国CN2、美国高防、美国GIA等云服务器,线路优化的不错。易探云刚好就是做香港及美国云服务器的主要商家之一,我们来看一下易探云美国云服...
winrar5.0为你推荐
中国微信5机构appleowned163三星iphone供应商iphone127.0.0.1传奇服务器非法网关连接: 127.0.0.1phpechophp echo函数 是什么意思win7关闭135端口win7系统怎么关闭135端口?网上很多方法都不好用!css选择器css有哪些选择器苹果5.1完美越狱iOS5.1.1完美越狱教程
域名备案流程 万网域名解析 互联网域名管理办法 budgetvm 187邮箱 56折 512m 12306抢票攻略 NetSpeeder 日本空间 免费个人网站申请 云全民 工作站服务器 isp服务商 php空间购买 vip域名 idc查询 华为云服务登录 中国电信测速器 vul 更多