copy谷歌sb
谷歌sb 时间:2021-05-21 阅读:()
RuleBasedPlagiarismDetectionusingInformationRetrievalAniruddhaGhosh,PinakiBhaskar,SantanuPal,SivajiBandyopadhyayDepartmentofComputerScienceandEngineering,JadavpurUniversity,Kolkata–700032,India{arghyaonline,pinaki.
bhaskar,santanu.
pal.
ju}@gmail.
com,sivaji_cse_ju@yahoo.
comAbstract.
ThispaperreportsaboutthedevelopmentofaPlagiarismdetectionsystemasapartofthePlagiarismdetectiontaskinPAN2011.
TheexternalplagiarismdetectionproblemhasbeensolvedwiththehelpofNutch,anopensourceInformationRetrieval(IR)system.
Thesystemcontainsthreephases–knowledgepreparation,candidateretrievalandplagiarismdetection.
Fromthesourcedocuments,knowledgebasehasbeenpreparedfordevelopingtheNutchindexandthequerieshavebeenformedfromthesuspiciousdocumentsforsubmissiontotheNutchIRsystem.
TheretrievedcandidatesourcesentencesareassignedsimilarityscoresbyNutch.
Dissimilarityscoreisassignedforeachcandidatesentenceandthesuspicioussentence.
Eachcandidatesourcesentenceisrankedbasedonthesetwoscores.
Thetoprankedcandidatesentenceisselectedforeachsuspicioussentence.
Keywords:PlagiarismDetection,InformationRetrievalSystem,SimilarityScore,DissimilarityScore.
1IntroductionPlagiarismmaybedefinedasthewrongfulmisuseandclosereplicationofthoughts,ideas,orexpressionsfromtheoriginalworkofsomeoneinthesamelanguageoffromanotherlanguage.
From18thcentury,plagiarismhasbeenconsideredasacademicdishonesty[1].
Fordecades,researchershaveexploreddifferenttechniquestodetectplagiarism.
Plagiarismcanoccurindifferentforms–fullplagiarism,substantialplagiarism,minimalisticplagiarism,sourcecitationetc.
IthasbecomeachallengingtaskintheareaofNaturalLanguageProcessing.
Inourapproach,wehaveconsideredalltheformsofplagiarismexceptminimalisticplagiarismatthesentencelevel.
Duetoabsenceofcontrolledevaluationenvironmenttocompareresultsofthealgorithms,plagiarismdetectionisstillachallengingtask[2].
Researchershaveorganizedvariousconferences(similartoPAN)toovercometheplagiarismproblem.
Fingerprintretrievalmethod[3],candidateretrieval[4]andpassageretrieval[5]arethemostprominentattemptsonplagiarismdetection.
Thesystemdescribedin[6]workswithanaturallanguageparsertofindswappedwordsandphrasestodetectintentionalplagiarismwhilen-gramco-occurrencestatisticisusedtodetectverbatimcopy.
TheLongestCommonSubsequencetechniquehasbeenusedin[7]tohandletextmodification.
Researchershaveusedcosinesimilarityscoreandn-gramvectorspacemodelatdifferentlevels,i.
e.
,word[8]andcharacter[9]levels.
Inthepresentwork,plagiarismhasbeentreatedasanIRproblem.
Anopensourcesearchengine,Nutch,hasbeenusedtoretrievetheplagiarizedpartsfromthesuspiciousdocuments.
2SystemFrameworkTheInformationRetrieval(Nutch1)basedPlagiarismDetectionsystemframeworkisshowninthefigure1.
Thesystemisdefinedinthreephases:KnowledgePreparation,CandidateRetrieval,i.
e.
,identificationofsuspicioussentenceandtheprobablesetofsourcesentencepairsandfinallyplagiarismdetectionofeachidentifiedsuspicioussentence.
Fig.
1.
SystemArchitecture3KnowledgePreparationEachsourcedocumentisparsedtoidentifyandextractallthesentencesinthedocument.
NowKnowledgefilesaregeneratedforeachsourcesentence.
Thefilenamesofknowledgefilesarecreatedinsuchamannerthatthesourcesentenceintheoriginalsourcedocumentcanbetracked.
Theknowledgeofeachsentenceintheknowledgefileisstoredintheformofstems,synonyms,hyponyms,hypernymsandsynsetsofeachword(afterremovalofthestopwords)thatareextractedfromWordNet3.
02.
Duplicatewordsareremovedtogetthesetofidenticalsenseuniquewords.
Thesewordsareusedtoidentifytheplagiarizedwords,thewordsthataresimilarinsensetotheoriginalwords.
Theoriginalwordsinthesentenceareaddedtothissetofwords.
Thus,eachknowledgefileforasentenceconsistsofasetofwords.
Afteralltheknowledgefilesarebuilt,theseareindexedusingLucene3.
1http://nutch.
apache.
org/2http://wordnet.
princeton.
edu/3http://lucene.
apache.
org/4CandidatesRetrievalEachsuspiciousdocumentisparsedtoidentifyandextractallthesentencesinthesuspiciousdocuments.
EachSuspicioussentenceisconsideredfromtheparsedsuspiciousdocumenttogeneratethequery.
FirstallthestopwordsareremovedfromthesentenceandthentheremainingwordsarebeingstemmedusingWordNet3.
0stemmertogettherootformofeachword.
Aftergeneratingthequeryfromthesuspicioussentences,thequeryisfiredtoNutchtoretrievetheprobablesetofsourcesentencescorrespondingtoeachsuspicioussentence.
Assourcedocumentsaresplitintosentencesintofilesandeachfilecontainsonlyonesentence,Nutchperformsasentence-sentencemappingforaproximalmatchbetweenthequeryandindexedsourcefiles.
AsetofprobablecandidatesourcesentencesisidentifiedbyNutchinrankedorderforeachsuspicioussentence.
Nutchprovidesthesimilarityscorebetweenasuspicioussentenceandthecorrespondingcandidatesourcesentence.
5PlagiarismDetectionAnalgorithmfordissimilaritymeasurement,proposedin[10],hasbeenusedtocalculatethedissimilarityscorebetweenthesuspicioussentenceanditscorrespondingretrievedcandidatesentences.
Foridenticalsentencesthathavemostnumberofidenticaln-grams,thedissimilarityscoreis0.
Usingthismeasurewehavecalculatedthedissimilarityscoresofeachsourcesentencecorrespondingtothesuspicioussentences.
Thedissimilarityscorearesubtractedfromthesimilarityscoreforeachcandidatesourcesentenceandafinalfine-grainedscorehasbeengenerated.
Alltheretrievedcandidatesourcesentencesforeachsuspicioussentencearerankedaccordingtothisfine-grainedscore.
Thetoprankedcandidatesourcesentenceisidentifiedasthesourcesentencefortheplagiarizedsentenceinthesuspiciousdocument.
6EvaluationTheplagiarismdetectionsystemwasevaluatedusingtheevaluationframeworkdescribedin[2].
TheevaluationscoresareshowninTable1.
Table1.
EvaluationMeasurementPrecisionRecallGranularityPladgetScore0.
00118290.
00500522.
00288180.
00120637ConclusionandFutureWorksThepresenttaskisourfirstattemptinplagiarismdetection.
Wehavetestedtheplagiarismatthesentencelevelbutphraselevelexperimentationisstillleftforinvestigate.
Infuture,analgorithmhastobedevelopedtotesttherelevanceofthecandidatesourcesentencesretrievedbyNutchandchoosethemostrelevantplagiarizedpart.
Theknowledgefilesforthesourcedocumentswillalsohavetobeupdated.
AcknowledgmentTheworkhasbeencarriedoutwithsupportfromDepartmentofInformationTechnology(DIT),Govt.
ofIndiafundedProjectDevelopmentof"CrossLingualInformationAccess(CLIA)"SystemPhaseII.
References1.
WikipediaarticleonPlagiarism:http://en.
wikipedia.
org/wiki/Plagiarism2.
PotthastM.
etal.
:AnEvaluationFrameworkforPlagiarismDetection.
InProceedingsoftheCOLING2010,Beijing,China,August2010.
3.
YuriiPalkovskii,AlexeiBelovandIrinaMuzika.
:ExploringFingerprintingasExternalPlagiarismDetectionMethod:LabReportforPANatCLEF2010.
InBraschleretal.
[2].
ISBN978-88-904810-0-0.
4.
VivianeP.
Moreira,RafaelC.
PereiraandGalanteRenata.
:UFRGS@PAN2010:DetectingExternalPlagiarism:LabReportforPanatCLEF2010.
InBraschleretal.
[2].
ISBN978-88-904810-0-0.
5.
ClaraVaniaandMirnaAdriani.
:ExternalPlagiarismDetectionUsingPassageSimilarities:LabReportforPANatCLEF2010.
InBraschleretal.
[2].
ISBN978-88-904810-0-0.
6.
M.
Mozgovoy,T.
KakkonenandE.
Sutinen.
:UsingNaturalLanguageParsersinPlagiarismDetection.
InProceedingofSLaTE'07Workshop,Pennsylvania,USA,October2007.
7.
Chen,Chien-Ying,Jen-YuanYehandHao-RenKe.
:PlagiarismDetectionusingROUGEandWordNet.
JournalofComputing,2(3),pages34-44,March2010.
https://sites.
google.
com/site/journalofcomputing/.
ISSN2151-9617.
8.
CristianGrozeaandMariusPopescu.
:Encoplot-PerformanceintheSecondInternationalPlagiarismDetectionChallenge:LabReportforPANatCLEF2010.
InBraschleretal.
[2].
ISBN978-88-904810-0-0.
9.
Basileetal.
:APlagiarismDetectionProcedureinThreeSteps:Selection,Matchesand"Squares".
InProceedingsoftheSEPLN2009WorkshoponUncoveringPlagiarism,AuthorshipandSocialSoftwareMisuse(PAN2009),Donostia-SanSebastian,Spain.
10.
VladoKeselj,FuchunPeng,NickCerconeandCalvinThomas.
:"N-gram-basedAuthorProfilesforAuthorshipAttribution".
InProceedingsofthePACLING'03,DalhousieUniversity,Halifax,NovaScotia,Canada,pp.
255-264,August2003.
bhaskar,santanu.
pal.
ju}@gmail.
com,sivaji_cse_ju@yahoo.
comAbstract.
ThispaperreportsaboutthedevelopmentofaPlagiarismdetectionsystemasapartofthePlagiarismdetectiontaskinPAN2011.
TheexternalplagiarismdetectionproblemhasbeensolvedwiththehelpofNutch,anopensourceInformationRetrieval(IR)system.
Thesystemcontainsthreephases–knowledgepreparation,candidateretrievalandplagiarismdetection.
Fromthesourcedocuments,knowledgebasehasbeenpreparedfordevelopingtheNutchindexandthequerieshavebeenformedfromthesuspiciousdocumentsforsubmissiontotheNutchIRsystem.
TheretrievedcandidatesourcesentencesareassignedsimilarityscoresbyNutch.
Dissimilarityscoreisassignedforeachcandidatesentenceandthesuspicioussentence.
Eachcandidatesourcesentenceisrankedbasedonthesetwoscores.
Thetoprankedcandidatesentenceisselectedforeachsuspicioussentence.
Keywords:PlagiarismDetection,InformationRetrievalSystem,SimilarityScore,DissimilarityScore.
1IntroductionPlagiarismmaybedefinedasthewrongfulmisuseandclosereplicationofthoughts,ideas,orexpressionsfromtheoriginalworkofsomeoneinthesamelanguageoffromanotherlanguage.
From18thcentury,plagiarismhasbeenconsideredasacademicdishonesty[1].
Fordecades,researchershaveexploreddifferenttechniquestodetectplagiarism.
Plagiarismcanoccurindifferentforms–fullplagiarism,substantialplagiarism,minimalisticplagiarism,sourcecitationetc.
IthasbecomeachallengingtaskintheareaofNaturalLanguageProcessing.
Inourapproach,wehaveconsideredalltheformsofplagiarismexceptminimalisticplagiarismatthesentencelevel.
Duetoabsenceofcontrolledevaluationenvironmenttocompareresultsofthealgorithms,plagiarismdetectionisstillachallengingtask[2].
Researchershaveorganizedvariousconferences(similartoPAN)toovercometheplagiarismproblem.
Fingerprintretrievalmethod[3],candidateretrieval[4]andpassageretrieval[5]arethemostprominentattemptsonplagiarismdetection.
Thesystemdescribedin[6]workswithanaturallanguageparsertofindswappedwordsandphrasestodetectintentionalplagiarismwhilen-gramco-occurrencestatisticisusedtodetectverbatimcopy.
TheLongestCommonSubsequencetechniquehasbeenusedin[7]tohandletextmodification.
Researchershaveusedcosinesimilarityscoreandn-gramvectorspacemodelatdifferentlevels,i.
e.
,word[8]andcharacter[9]levels.
Inthepresentwork,plagiarismhasbeentreatedasanIRproblem.
Anopensourcesearchengine,Nutch,hasbeenusedtoretrievetheplagiarizedpartsfromthesuspiciousdocuments.
2SystemFrameworkTheInformationRetrieval(Nutch1)basedPlagiarismDetectionsystemframeworkisshowninthefigure1.
Thesystemisdefinedinthreephases:KnowledgePreparation,CandidateRetrieval,i.
e.
,identificationofsuspicioussentenceandtheprobablesetofsourcesentencepairsandfinallyplagiarismdetectionofeachidentifiedsuspicioussentence.
Fig.
1.
SystemArchitecture3KnowledgePreparationEachsourcedocumentisparsedtoidentifyandextractallthesentencesinthedocument.
NowKnowledgefilesaregeneratedforeachsourcesentence.
Thefilenamesofknowledgefilesarecreatedinsuchamannerthatthesourcesentenceintheoriginalsourcedocumentcanbetracked.
Theknowledgeofeachsentenceintheknowledgefileisstoredintheformofstems,synonyms,hyponyms,hypernymsandsynsetsofeachword(afterremovalofthestopwords)thatareextractedfromWordNet3.
02.
Duplicatewordsareremovedtogetthesetofidenticalsenseuniquewords.
Thesewordsareusedtoidentifytheplagiarizedwords,thewordsthataresimilarinsensetotheoriginalwords.
Theoriginalwordsinthesentenceareaddedtothissetofwords.
Thus,eachknowledgefileforasentenceconsistsofasetofwords.
Afteralltheknowledgefilesarebuilt,theseareindexedusingLucene3.
1http://nutch.
apache.
org/2http://wordnet.
princeton.
edu/3http://lucene.
apache.
org/4CandidatesRetrievalEachsuspiciousdocumentisparsedtoidentifyandextractallthesentencesinthesuspiciousdocuments.
EachSuspicioussentenceisconsideredfromtheparsedsuspiciousdocumenttogeneratethequery.
FirstallthestopwordsareremovedfromthesentenceandthentheremainingwordsarebeingstemmedusingWordNet3.
0stemmertogettherootformofeachword.
Aftergeneratingthequeryfromthesuspicioussentences,thequeryisfiredtoNutchtoretrievetheprobablesetofsourcesentencescorrespondingtoeachsuspicioussentence.
Assourcedocumentsaresplitintosentencesintofilesandeachfilecontainsonlyonesentence,Nutchperformsasentence-sentencemappingforaproximalmatchbetweenthequeryandindexedsourcefiles.
AsetofprobablecandidatesourcesentencesisidentifiedbyNutchinrankedorderforeachsuspicioussentence.
Nutchprovidesthesimilarityscorebetweenasuspicioussentenceandthecorrespondingcandidatesourcesentence.
5PlagiarismDetectionAnalgorithmfordissimilaritymeasurement,proposedin[10],hasbeenusedtocalculatethedissimilarityscorebetweenthesuspicioussentenceanditscorrespondingretrievedcandidatesentences.
Foridenticalsentencesthathavemostnumberofidenticaln-grams,thedissimilarityscoreis0.
Usingthismeasurewehavecalculatedthedissimilarityscoresofeachsourcesentencecorrespondingtothesuspicioussentences.
Thedissimilarityscorearesubtractedfromthesimilarityscoreforeachcandidatesourcesentenceandafinalfine-grainedscorehasbeengenerated.
Alltheretrievedcandidatesourcesentencesforeachsuspicioussentencearerankedaccordingtothisfine-grainedscore.
Thetoprankedcandidatesourcesentenceisidentifiedasthesourcesentencefortheplagiarizedsentenceinthesuspiciousdocument.
6EvaluationTheplagiarismdetectionsystemwasevaluatedusingtheevaluationframeworkdescribedin[2].
TheevaluationscoresareshowninTable1.
Table1.
EvaluationMeasurementPrecisionRecallGranularityPladgetScore0.
00118290.
00500522.
00288180.
00120637ConclusionandFutureWorksThepresenttaskisourfirstattemptinplagiarismdetection.
Wehavetestedtheplagiarismatthesentencelevelbutphraselevelexperimentationisstillleftforinvestigate.
Infuture,analgorithmhastobedevelopedtotesttherelevanceofthecandidatesourcesentencesretrievedbyNutchandchoosethemostrelevantplagiarizedpart.
Theknowledgefilesforthesourcedocumentswillalsohavetobeupdated.
AcknowledgmentTheworkhasbeencarriedoutwithsupportfromDepartmentofInformationTechnology(DIT),Govt.
ofIndiafundedProjectDevelopmentof"CrossLingualInformationAccess(CLIA)"SystemPhaseII.
References1.
WikipediaarticleonPlagiarism:http://en.
wikipedia.
org/wiki/Plagiarism2.
PotthastM.
etal.
:AnEvaluationFrameworkforPlagiarismDetection.
InProceedingsoftheCOLING2010,Beijing,China,August2010.
3.
YuriiPalkovskii,AlexeiBelovandIrinaMuzika.
:ExploringFingerprintingasExternalPlagiarismDetectionMethod:LabReportforPANatCLEF2010.
InBraschleretal.
[2].
ISBN978-88-904810-0-0.
4.
VivianeP.
Moreira,RafaelC.
PereiraandGalanteRenata.
:UFRGS@PAN2010:DetectingExternalPlagiarism:LabReportforPanatCLEF2010.
InBraschleretal.
[2].
ISBN978-88-904810-0-0.
5.
ClaraVaniaandMirnaAdriani.
:ExternalPlagiarismDetectionUsingPassageSimilarities:LabReportforPANatCLEF2010.
InBraschleretal.
[2].
ISBN978-88-904810-0-0.
6.
M.
Mozgovoy,T.
KakkonenandE.
Sutinen.
:UsingNaturalLanguageParsersinPlagiarismDetection.
InProceedingofSLaTE'07Workshop,Pennsylvania,USA,October2007.
7.
Chen,Chien-Ying,Jen-YuanYehandHao-RenKe.
:PlagiarismDetectionusingROUGEandWordNet.
JournalofComputing,2(3),pages34-44,March2010.
https://sites.
google.
com/site/journalofcomputing/.
ISSN2151-9617.
8.
CristianGrozeaandMariusPopescu.
:Encoplot-PerformanceintheSecondInternationalPlagiarismDetectionChallenge:LabReportforPANatCLEF2010.
InBraschleretal.
[2].
ISBN978-88-904810-0-0.
9.
Basileetal.
:APlagiarismDetectionProcedureinThreeSteps:Selection,Matchesand"Squares".
InProceedingsoftheSEPLN2009WorkshoponUncoveringPlagiarism,AuthorshipandSocialSoftwareMisuse(PAN2009),Donostia-SanSebastian,Spain.
10.
VladoKeselj,FuchunPeng,NickCerconeandCalvinThomas.
:"N-gram-basedAuthorProfilesforAuthorshipAttribution".
InProceedingsofthePACLING'03,DalhousieUniversity,Halifax,NovaScotia,Canada,pp.
255-264,August2003.
HostKvm（$4.25/月）俄罗斯/香港高防VPS
HostKvm又上新了，这次上架了2个线路产品：俄罗斯和香港高防VPS，其中俄罗斯经测试电信CN2线路，而香港高防VPS提供30Gbps攻击防御。HostKvm是一家成立于2013年的国外主机服务商，主要提供基于KVM架构的VPS主机，可选数据中心包括日本、新加坡、韩国、美国、中国香港等多个地区机房，均为国内直连或优化线路，延迟较低，适合建站或者远程办公等。俄罗斯VPSCPU：1core内存：2G...
Digital-VM80美元新加坡和日本独立服务器
Digital-VM商家的暑期活动促销，这个商家提供有多个数据中心独立服务器、VPS主机产品。最低配置月付80美元，支持带宽、流量和IP的自定义配置。Digital-VM，是2019年新成立的商家，主要从事日本东京、新加坡、美国洛杉矶、荷兰阿姆斯特丹、西班牙马德里、挪威奥斯陆、丹麦哥本哈根数据中心的KVM架构VPS产品销售，分为大硬盘型（1Gbps带宽端口、分配较大的硬盘）和大带宽型（10Gbps...
RangCloud19.8元/月，香港cn2云主机，美国西雅图高防云主机28元/月起
rangcloud怎么样?rangcloud是去年年初开办的国人商家，RangCloud是一家以销售NAT起步，后续逐渐开始拓展到VPS及云主机业务，目前有中国香港、美国西雅图、韩国NAT、广州移动、江门移动、镇江BGP、山东联通、山东BGP等机房。目前，RangCloud提供香港CN2线路云服务器，电信走CN2、联通移动直连，云主机采用PCle固态硬盘，19.8元/月起，支持建站使用;美国高防云...
谷歌sb为你推荐
-
输入搜狗拼音输入法4stronglyios11回收卡巴斯基支持ipad支持ipad支持ipad支持ipadipad连不上wifiiPad 连不上Wifi，显示无互联网连接勒索病毒win7补丁win7有针对勒索病毒的补丁吗联通版iphone4s怎么知道到苹果4s是联通版，还是移动版